关系化对象与关系从句的位置——基于真实语料和类型分析被引量：52

Correlations between demonstrative constituents and the positions of relative clauses in spontaneous conversation:A typological perspective

原文传递

导出

摘要本文在关系化理论背景下,区分了有准备的书面语材料和无准备的自然口语材料,在此基础上统计分析了“关内式”即[指示成分-关系从句-核心名词]和“关外式”即[关系从句-指示成分-核心名词]这两种关系化结构的使用条件,得到一些被前人忽略的发现:(1)在书面语中,“关内式”与主语关系化存在关联,“关外式”与宾语关系化存在关联;(2)在无准备口语中典型“关内式”几乎不说,“关外式”几乎一统天下,属于优势语序;(3)如果一种汉语方言或语言其名词短语的所有修饰语都前置于核心,那么若存在“关内式”,也必然存在“关外式”。文章同时在优选论框架下提出不同语体中使用两种格式的制约条件优先序列,并对二者的取舍进行了分析。文章也附带地显示了语体视野和类型学视野对于汉语语法研究的重要性。 In NP,Chinese demonstratives such as zhe(这),na(那),zhege(这个),nazhang(那张)can occur in two positions:(1)at the initial position followed by a relative clause + de + noun head;and(2)immediately before the noun head,i.e.relative clause(+ de +)demonstratives + noun head.The first structure is referred to as the relative-internal position,whereas the second the relative-external position.The paper first presents a critical review of the literature on these two structures.The bulk of the paper is to present a fresh analysis from a typological perspective,drawing data from spontaneous conversations as well as from written texts.

作者唐正大

机构地区中国社会科学院语言研究所

出处《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期139-150,共12页 Contemporary Linguistics

基金国家社科基金十.五规划重点项目"名词短语句法结构的类型学比较"(03AYY002) 中国社会科学院青年科研启动基金的资助

关键词关系化对象关内式关外式优选论蕴涵性共性 Chinese demonstratives,relative-internal structure,relative-external structure

分类号 H146 [语言文字—汉语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Bever,T.G.1970.The cognitive basis for linguistic structures.In J.Hayes,ed.,Cognition and the Development of Language.New York:Wiley.Pp.279-362.
2Bever,T.G.and D.Langendoen.1971.A dynamic model of evolution of language.Linguistic Inquiry 2:433-63.
3Campbell,G.L.2000.Compendium of the World's Languages.New York:Routledge.
4Carlson,G.N.1977.A unified analysis of the English bare plural.Linguistics and Philosophy 1:413-57.
5Chao,Yuen Ren(赵元任).1970[1968].A Grammar of Spoken Chinese.Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press.中译本:吕叔湘译,1979,《汉语口语语法》北京:商务印书馆.
6Frazier,L.1985.Syntactic complexity.In D.R.Dowty,L.Karttunen,and A.Zwicky,eds.,Natural Language Parsing:Psychological,Computational,and Theoretical Perspectives.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Pp.128-89.
7Greenberg,Joseph H.1966[1963].Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements.In J.H.Greenberg,ed.,Universal of Language(2nd edition).Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.Pp.73-113.
8Hankamer,J.1973.Unacceptable ambiguity.Linguistic Inquiry 4:17-68.
9Hawkins,J.A.1994.A Parsing Theory of Order and Constituency.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
10Kager,R.1999.Optimality Theory.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.