摘要
[目的]了解上海市卢湾区3种不同职业人群的职业紧张程度。[方法]以617名科研与行政管理人员、中学教师和物业管理员工为研究对象,采用工作要求-自主模式问卷调查各组人群职业紧张程度,比较评估因子得分、卡方检验和Logistic回归分析职业紧张程度的影响因素。[结果]职业紧张评估因子(工作要求、自主程度、技能、社会支持)的得分在不同年龄组、受教育程度及职业类型间均存在具有统计学意义的差异,而不同性别差异无统计学意义。职业紧张程度分级比较结果表明,在所有调查对象中职业紧张程度高的占50.2%,科研与行政管理人员为36.5%,教师为56.3%,而物业管理员工为50.4%。Logistic回归分析显示:教师OR为2.69(1.618~4.454),物业员工OR为2.30 (1.156~4.566)。而不同年龄、性别与受教育程度贡献无统计学意义。[结论]研究人群职业紧张程度较高,特别需要关注教师与物业员工人群。
[ Objective ] To assess job strain of people in different types of job in Luwan District. [ Methods ] Using a working requirement & self-determination questionnaire, targeting at 617 persons from teachers, science researchers, government officials and administrators of building-keeping, to assess the level of their psychosocial job strain. Then use analysis of variance to assess each factor's contribution, and use chi-square test and logistic regression to compare factors Which have influence on people's job strain. [ Results ] Taking "demand", "control", "skill", and "social support" as the factors determining people's strain, their scores are statistical significantly different among age goups, educational background, and jobs, but not significant between sex groups. It shows that 50.2% of the studied group of people are in higher job strain, and it counts as 36.5% for science researchers and government officials, 56.3% for teachers, and 50.4% for administrators of building-keeping. Multi-way analysis of variance shows that OR for teachers and administrators of building-keeping are 2.69 ( 1.618-4.454 )and 2.30 ( 1.156-4.566 ) respectively. There's significant difference between different jobs, but not significant between ages, gender and educational background. [ Conclusion ] Researcher population are in higher job strain than others, in which teachers and administrators of building-keeping need much care.
出处
《环境与职业医学》
CAS
北大核心
2007年第3期333-335,共3页
Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
关键词
职业紧张
工作要求-自主模式
个体特征
职业类型
job strain
Working requirement & self-determination
questionnaire
types of profession