摘要
目的:比较两种非手术方法治疗子宫脱垂的有效性。方法:选取86例子宫脱垂Ⅰ、Ⅱ度的患者,随机分为两组,一组将盆底肌肉电刺激器插入阴道内进行电刺激治疗,共42例;另一组将哑铃状的陶瓷阴道圆锥插入患者阴道内进行盆底肌功能训练,共44例,治疗前后分别对子宫脱垂情况、最大阴道内压、盆底肌收缩持续时间进行检查,并对患者满意度用自测健康评定量表进行测定。结果:治疗后两组子宫脱垂情况均较治疗前得到明显改善(P(0.01),最大阴道内压和盆底肌收缩持续时间均明显提高(P(0.01),但两组比较差异无统计学意义(P(0.05);治疗后自测健康评定量表总分及各分量表分都有明显的提高。结论:两种非手术方法治疗子宫脱垂均有明显的疗效,值得临床应用。
Objective： To compare the effectiveness of two methods of non - surgical therapy of uterus prolapse. Methods： 86 patients of uterus prolapse with Ⅰ°and Ⅱ°were selected and divided into two groups randomly： one group was inserting the pelvic floor muscle -electric stimulation apparatus into vagina for electricic stimulation therapeutics （electric stimulation group, 42 cases） , another group was inserting the ceramic taper like dumbbell into vagina for pelvic floor muscle training（vagina taper group, 44 cases）. The status of uterus prolapse, the highest vagina press, the duration of pelvic floor muscle shrink were examined before and after therapy. At the same time the patients＇ satisfactory degree evaluated by self - rated health measurement scale（SRHMS） were examined. Results： The status of uterus prolapse after treatment significantly improved than before in two groups（P 〈0.01 ）. Both the the highest vagina press and the duration of pelvic floor muscle shrink were markedly improved（P 〈0.01 ） in two groups but showed no difference in two groups（P 〉 0.05 ）. The total score and score of every subscale of SRHMS were significantly increased after therapy. Conclusion： It is recommended to advocate clinical application of the two methods of non - surgical therapy on uterus prolapse because of its significant effectiveness.
出处
《中国计划生育学杂志》
北大核心
2007年第6期357-359,共3页
Chinese Journal of Family Planning
关键词
子宫脱垂
电刺激疗法
盆底肌肉功能训练
自测健康评定量表
Uterus prolapse
Electricity stimulation therapeutics
Pelvic floor muscle training
Self - rated health measurement scale
