环境管制与企业竞争力——基于“波特假说”的质疑被引量：46

Environmental Regulations and Competitiveness of Corporations——Oppugn based on "Porter Hypothesis"

导出

摘要波特假说认为,恰当的环境规制可以激发被管制企业创新,有利于提升企业的竞争力。然而本文通过分析发现,波特假说不具有一般性。环境管制对企业竞争力的影响主要是在企业的生产成本、产品的差异化、企业对环境管制的态度等方面,企业的处境不同,环境管制对企业竞争力的影响也就不同。我们不能完全迷信于波特假说,而是要具体分析我国企业的现状,制定适合我国企业发展的环境管制措施,尽量减少对我国企业竞争力的负面影响。 Porter hypothesis considers that felicitous environmental regulations may bestir corporations to innovate, so environmental regulations will be good for the competitiveness of corporations, However, this paper thinks that Porter hypothesis is not of universality. The effects of environmental regulations on competitiveness of corporations are different if the corporations are in different places. In this case, environmental measurement must be adopted in accordance with the actuality of corporations in China,

作者许士春

机构地区中国矿业大学管理学院

出处《国际贸易问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期78-83,共6页 Journal of International Trade

基金江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究项目(项目号:05SJD790060) 中国矿业大学青年教师培育计划基金项目"环境管制与企业竞争力问题研究"的部分研究成果。

关键词环境管制企业竞争力波特假说 Environmental regulations Competition of corporations Porter hypothesis

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1傅京燕.环境成本内部化与产业国际竞争力[J].中国工业经济,2002(6):37-44. 被引量：48
2张嫚.环境规制对企业竞争力的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14(4):126-130. 被引量：43
3张嫚.环境规制与企业行为间的关联机制研究[J].财经问题研究,2005(4):34-39. 被引量：46
4Albrecht Johan, Environmental Regulation, Comparative Advantage and the Porter Hypothesis, Milan: FEEM Nota di Lavoro.
5Barbera A J, Me Conncell V D, (1990) "The Impact of Envi-ronmental Regulations on Industry Productivity: Direct and Indirect Effects," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18, 50-65
6Brannlund R Y Chung et al, (1995) "Emissions Trading and Profitability: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry," RePEc Working Papers.
7Folmer, H., van Mouche, P.and Ragl, (1993) "Interconnected Gamesand International Environmental Problems," Environ -mental and Resource Economics3, 313-335.
8Jaffe A B, Peterson S R, Portney P R, (1995) "Environmental Regulations and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us," Journal of Economics Literature, 132-163.
9Porter, M. A, (1991) "America' s Green Strategy," Scientific American 168, 264.
10Porter, M. A, (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York : The Free Press.

二级参考文献25

1Jaffe A B, Peterson S R , Portney P R, Stavins R N. Environmental Regulation and the competitiveness of U. S. Manufacttaing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us[J] .Journal of Economics Literature, 1995,33:132-163.
2Maler K G.The acid rain game[C]. In: Folmer H,van Ireland E. eds. Valuation Methods and Policy Making in Environmental[A].Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989.
3Porter M E. America's green strategy[J], scientific American, 1991,(6).
4Sehot Johan, Kurt Fischer. Introduction: The greening the industrial film[A]. In: Kurt Fischer:, Johan Schot. Environmental strategies for industry: International perspectives on research needs and policy implications[C]. Washington D C:Island Press, 1993.
5Walley N, Whitehead B.It's not easy being green[J].Harvard Business Review, 1994,72(3).
6Albrecht Johan. Environmenyal regulation, comparative advantage and the porter hypothesis[M]. Milan:FEEM Nota dl Lavoro, 1997.
7Alpay S.Can environmental regulations be compatible with higher international competitiveness? Some new theoretical insights[M]. Milan: FEEM Nora di Lavoro,2001.
8Barbera A J, McConnell V D. the impact of environmental regulations on industry productiviy: direct and indirect effects[J] .Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1990,18:50-65.
9Brannlund R Y Chung et al. Emissions Trading and Prdltability: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry[M] .RePEc working papers, 1995.
10Gray W B, Shabegian. Pollution Abatement Cost, Regulation and Plant Level Productivity[M] .Washington D C:NBER Working Paper, 1995.