摘要
本文对“内卷化”概念提出了一种不同于目前学术界流行诠释的新理解:内卷化是对经济主体特别是家庭农场(农户)自我战胜和自我锁定机理的一种概括;它分别体现在两个不同的层面上,相应地形成内卷化区间ⅰ和内卷化区间ⅱ。这既是对格尔茨关于内卷化概念之本源的承继和挖掘,又能够整合黄宗智用内卷化概念所考察和揭示的问题,并把内卷化看作是小农经济内在稳定性的一种可能的机制。如果说内卷化侧重于对某种经济过程尤其是某种农业经济过程的刻画,那么,刘易斯模型则偏重于对结果性现象的表述。将内卷化与刘易斯模型相联系,可以为经由工业化、城市化和农村剩余劳动力转移而“去内卷化”拓展理论和实践空间。
The paper puts forward a new interpretation of the concept of “involution”,which differs from the prevailing opinion in academic circles.Involution,which is a generalization of the mechanism of economic entity,especially the family farms,to self-overcome and to self-lock in,is embodied in two different aspects,thus Involution Region i and Involution Region ii come into being.This paper follows and delves into the original concept of involution by Greetz,as well as integrates the relevant problems investigated and revealed by Philip C.C.Huang,and it treats involution as a probable mechanism to achieve the inner stability of small-scale peasant economy.Compared with involution which lays particularly emphasis on economic process,especially agricultural economic process,Lewis Model lays stress on describing consequent phenomena.The combination of involution and Lewis Model will broaden the theoretical and practical space of de-involution,which is to be achieved by industrialization,urbanization and the migration of rural surplus labors.
出处
《社会学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第3期194-208,共15页
Sociological Studies
基金
教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目“建立城乡统一的劳动力市场,实现城乡劳动者平等就业研究”
浙江省社科基金项目“低收入者工资决定机制研究”的资助.
