期刊文献+

猪瘟病毒4种检测方法的比较 被引量:14

Comparisons of four methods for detection of classical swine fever virus
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用病毒分离鉴定、荧光抗体法、反转录-聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)和夹心ELISA 4种方法,分别对23份猪瘟病料组织中的猪瘟病毒(CSFV)进行了检测,并比较4种检测方法的优缺点。结果显示,病毒分离鉴定法准确性较高,诊断比较容易,但存在试验步骤繁琐,所需时间长的缺点;荧光抗体检测法所需时间较短,但需要经验比较丰富人员来判定结果,且存在假阳性结果,特异性比较差;RT-PCR检测法具有快速、敏感等优点,特别是样品保存不理想时更有价值,利用套式PCR(nested-PCR)可以提高检测的特异性;夹心ELISA检测法具有快速、敏感等优点,但在样品保存不理想时会出现假阴性结果。 Four methods including the virus isolation and identification, fluorescent antibody, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Sandwich ELISA were used to detect classical swine fever (CSFV) in 23 samples and were compared thereafter. The results showed that the virus isolation and identification could generate considerably reliable results but the procedure was complicated and costed long time;microtomy fluorescent antibody detection was fast, but the specificity was low and needed to exclude the false positive from the results. Sandwich ELISA detection combined the merits of the former two methods, but it generated the false negative results when the samples were in bad preservation. Compared with the others, RT-PCR was fast, high sensitive and especially useful for detecting the CSFV directly from the samples. The specificity could be raised by using the nested-PCR to detect the CSFV from the simples,especially when the simples were in bad preservation .
出处 《西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第5期24-28,共5页 Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 陕西省重大科技攻关项目(2006kz07-G2)
关键词 猪瘟 病毒分离鉴定 荧光抗体 反转录-聚合酶链式反应 ELISA classical swine fever virus isolation and identification fluorescent antibody RT-PCR ELISA
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1孟晓芹,郑明.国内猪瘟研究概况[J].中国兽药杂志,1995,29(3):56-58. 被引量:12
  • 2Lorena J,Barlic-Maganja D,Lojkic M,et al.Classical swine fever virus (C strain) distribution in organ samples of inoculated piglets[J].Vet Microbiol,2001,81 (1):1-8.
  • 3邵振华,田海燕.多价荧光抗体监测外源病毒污染的研究[J].中国兽药杂志,1997,31(2):1-6. 被引量:4
  • 4Clavijo A,Zhou E M,Vydelingum S,et al.Development and evaluation of a novel antigen capture assay for the detection of classical swine fever virus antigens[J].Vet Microbiol,1998,60(2-4):155-168.
  • 5Semenikhin VI,Puzyrev A T,Oreshkova S F,et al.Detection of the hog cholera virus using the polymerase chain reaction[J].Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol,1999,1:27-30.
  • 6萨姆布鲁克 J,费里奇 E F,曼尼阿蒂斯 T.分子克隆实验指南[M].2版.北京:科学技术出版社,1999:55-56.
  • 7韩雪清,李红卫,刘湘涛,李小兵,马军武,涂长春,胡弘博,殷震,蒋帅,刘伯华,李健强,李忠润,谢庆阁.中国猪瘟兔化弱毒兔脾组织毒部分基因序列分析[J].中国兽医科技,1998,28(6):12-16. 被引量:7
  • 8Canal CW,Hotzel I,Almeida L,et al.Differentiation of classical swine fever virus from ruminant pestiviruses by reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)[J].Vet Microbiol,1996,48(3-4):373-379.

二级参考文献4

共引文献24

同被引文献109

引证文献14

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部