期刊文献+

侧后方入路手术治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症 被引量:4

Operative treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in upper segments through posterior-lateral approach
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨侧后方入路手术治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症的效果和适应证。方法:腰椎间盘突出症患者27例,男16例,女11例;年龄18~61岁,平均35.6岁。单节段突出23例:L1,26例、L2,312例、L3,45例,多节段突出4例:L1,2+L4,51例、L2,3+L3,42例、L3,4+L4,51例所有病例均采用侧后方入路手术,直接摘除压迫脊髓前方的间盘组织、骨增生组织,如椎间盘不稳,则行椎间植骨融合、内固定治疗。结果:所有病例获得随访,随访时间12~53个月,平均29个月。根据Otani等分级方法评定疗效:优13例,良10例,进步4例。结论:侧后方入路手术是一种治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症的良好方法,临床应用时要掌握好其适应证。 Objective: To explore clinical effect and indications of posterior-lateral approach operation for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in upper segments. Methods: Twenty-seven patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, 16 cases were male and 11 cases were female with an average age of 35.6 years(rang from 18 to 61 ). Single segment disc herniation was 23 cases:L1.2 6 cases, L2.3 12 cases, L3.4 5 cases. Multi-segment disc herniation was 4 cases: L1.2 + L4.5 1 case, L2.3 + L3.4 2 ease,L3.4 + L4.5 1 case, All cases were treated through posterior-lateral approach to excise intervertebral disc and osteophytes. Some patients with lumbar instablility were treated with antogenous-grafting and internal fixation. Results: All the patients were followed up 12 -53 months with an average of 29 months. According to Otani's classification the result was excellent in 13 cases,good in 10,advance in 4, Conclusion: Surgical treatment through posterior-lateral approach is a good method for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in upper segments. Proper indication is important in clinical application.
出处 《中国骨伤》 CAS 2007年第4期251-252,共2页 China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
关键词 腰椎间盘突出 侧后路 内固定 脊柱融合术 Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation Posterior-lateral approach Internal fixation Spinal fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1曾志远,吴家和,陈为义,潘丈誉,黄伯成,施建辉,陈传昌,吴珊鹏.高位腰椎间盘突出症临床特点(附6例报告)[J].颈腰痛杂志,1994,15(1):37-38. 被引量:14
  • 2孙建民,于夕欣,孙宝凯.下胸段胸椎间盘突出症的临床表现和诊断[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1996,6(1):28-29. 被引量:3
  • 3黄公怡 王福权.顽固性腰椎间盘突出症的术中病理观察[J].中华骨科杂志,1982,(2):38-38.
  • 4James KS, Wenger KH, Schlegel JD et al.Biomechanical evalution of the stability of thoracolumbar burst fractures [ J ]. Spine,1994;19(15) :1731 - 1740.
  • 5Sjostrom L, Karlstrom G, Pech Pet al. Indirect spinal canal decompression in burst fractures treated with pedicle screw instrumentation[J]. Spine, 1996;21(1) :113-123.
  • 6Zou D, Yoo JU, Edwards WT et al. Mechanics of anatomic reduction of thoracolumbar burst fractures: comparison of distraction versus distraction plus lordosis in the anatomic reduction of the thoracolumbar burst fracture[J]. Spine, 1993; 18 (2) :195-203.
  • 7Muller U, Berlemann U, Sledge J et al.Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit by indirect reduction and posterior instrumentation: bisegmental stabilization with monosegmental fusion[J]. Eur Spine J, 1999;8(4) :284-289.
  • 8Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Yazici Met al.Short-segment pedicle instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: does transpedicular intracorporeal grafting prevent early failure[ J ]. Spine, 2001 ; 26 ( 2 ) : 213 -217.
  • 9Sanderson PL, Fraser RD, Hall DJ et al.Short segment fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures without fusion [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 1999;8(6) :495 -500.
  • 10Diamond TH, Clark WA.Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a novel treatment for acute vertebral fractures [ J ].174(8) :398-400.

共引文献81

同被引文献17

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部