期刊文献+

超短效与短效胰岛素强化治疗糖尿病的比较 被引量:1

Study of Insulin Lispro and Novolin R in Intensification Therapy on Diabetes Mellitus
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:观察超短效人胰岛素类似物赖脯胰岛素(优泌乐,Lispro)与短效胰岛素诺和灵R(Novolin R)在强化治疗中的疗效差异。方法:60名2型糖尿病患者随机分为两组,胰岛素泵治疗1周,观察两组治疗前后不同时间点血糖值变化、达标时间、胰岛素用量及有无低血糖发生。结果:Lispro组较Novolink R组血糖达标时间短、胰岛素用量少、两组均未发生低血糖。结论:在胰岛素泵强化治疗中Lispro更具优势。 Objective: To observe the difference of therapeutic effect between supershort-effect insulin analog lispro and shorteffect insulin novolin R on diabetes patients, Method: Sixty type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were divided into two groups and received insulin pump therapy for 2 weeks. The plasma glucose at different time after therapy, period of reaching target, total insulin dosage and whether hypoglycaemia happened were observed. Result: Period of reaching target of Lispro group was shorter than novolin R group, and total insulin dosage was less than novolin R group. There were no hypoglycaemia happened in neither groups. Conclusion: Lispro had an advantage comparing with novolin R in insulin pump intensification therapy.
出处 《中国药师》 CAS 2007年第5期487-488,共2页 China Pharmacist
关键词 赖脯胰岛素 诺和灵R 胰岛素泵 Insulin lispro Novolin R Insulin pump
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1郭瑞金,薛元明,施珏,蔡玮.人胰岛素类似物(Insulin Aspart)持续皮下注射治疗2型糖尿病[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2005,21(3):278-279. 被引量:24
  • 2Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (DCCT). The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-time complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med, 1993,329:977-986.
  • 3UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes.Lancet, 1998,352:837-853.
  • 4Thompson JS, Duckwoeth WC. Insulin pumps and glucose regulation.World J Surg. 2001.25:523-526.
  • 5Hermansen K, Fontaine P, Kukolja KK, et al. Insulin analogues(insulin detemir and insulin espart) versus traditional human insulins(NPH insulin and regular human insulin) in besal-bolus therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia, 2004,47:622-629.
  • 6Radermecker RP, Scheen AJ. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with short-acting insulin analogues or human regular insulin: efficacy,safety, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Diabetes Metab Res Rev,2004,20 : 178-188.
  • 7Heller SR. Insulin analogues. Curr Med Res Opin, 2002, 18 (Suppl 1):840-47.
  • 8Bretzel RG, Amolds S, Medding J, et al. A direct efficacy and safety comparison of insulin aspart, human soluble insulin, and human premix insulin (70/30) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2004,27 : 1023-1027.
  • 9Bott U, Ebrabim S, Hirschberger S, et al. Effect of the rapid-acting insulin analogue insulin espart on quality of life and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med, 2003,20:626-634.
  • 10Danne T, Aman J, Schober E, et al. A comparison of postprandial and preprandial administration of insulin espart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2003,26:2359-2364.

共引文献269

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部