摘要
诉讼时效是否已过属客观存在的事实,需要当事人在诉讼过程中予以证明,由当事人承担证明责任。以“法律规范说”为证明责任分配理论基础,对诉讼时效证明责任进行分配,必须明确主张和抗辩在证明责任分配中的作用以及诉讼时效作为抗辩权的效力定位。
Whether the limitation of action has expired is something objective, and needes to be proved by the parties who have to take the responsibility of burden of proof. However, sometimes judges are confused in determining which party should take the very responsibility in the judicial practice. The authors firstly discuss what effects the limitation of action brings, pointing out that expiry means the debtor gains the right to demur to repay. Secondly, the authors tells the difference between the procedural demurrer, denial and civil demurer, explaining that the procedural demurrer is different from denial; demurrer to repay is one kind of procedural demurrer. The party who denies facts doesn＇ t need to take the responsibility of burden of proof while the party claiming procedural demurrer needs. Finally, the authors discuss who and how should take the responsibility basing on the theory of Rosenberg.
出处
《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第1期55-61,共7页
Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
中国人民大学法学院中青年科研基金项目
"民法上的证据问题研究"
项目编号200501
关键词
诉讼时效
证明责任分配
“法律规范说”
诉讼抗辩
the limitation of action
distribution of burden of proof
the theory of Rosenberg
procedural demurrer
