摘要
和一般的侵权领域相比,体育侵权由于其固有的风险的存在而具有特殊性。一直以来,我国适用受害人同意作为体育侵权领域的免责事由,文章认为,英美法国家的风险自负原则更适用于体育侵权领域。这里谈到的体育侵权主要是指过失侵权,而受害人同意只是适用在故意侵权领域;体育侵权损害的产生是受害人反对的结果,而受害人同意的损害结果这是受害人积极追求的结果,等等的不同点告诉我们,引进风险自负原则作为免责事由是可能、可行而且是必须的。
Compared with other torts, sports tort is special due to his inherent risk. In the past, consent of victim is the defense to exempt the ciyil liabilities of defendant. I think assumption of risk in Anglo- American Law is more suitable. Here, sports tort is in negligence not intent, while consent of victim is the defense of intent tort. Besides, if the victim is willing to assume the risk, in fact, he opposes the damage or injury. If the victim is willing to consent, he is pursuing the damage or injury. All in all, there is possibility and necessity to introduce assumption of risk.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2007年第2期100-104,共5页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
