论行政裁量中的和解——以德国法和美国法为观察被引量：20

On Reconciliation in Administrative Discretion

导出

摘要和解作为一种合意性行政方式,是契约理念渗入行政法领域的典型表现形态,它以行政裁量为其存在的前提和空间,又是行政裁量得以有效运行的一种制度选择。构建我国行政裁量的和解制度,可以引入德国的和解契约制度,并借鉴美国非正式行政手法中的和解制度,将其作为一种行政方式规定在行政程序法中。 Abstract： As a kind of agreeable manner in administrative enforcement, reconciliation indicates the lecture learned by administrative circle from contract. Reconciliation, of which the precondition is discretion, is also a choice for administrative discretion to act effectively. As to constructing the reconciliation system for our administrative discretion, it is necessary to introduce the reconciliation contract from Germany and the reconciliation system of informal administrative manner in U.S., and make it a normal administrative manner in our Administrative Procedure Law in the future.

作者周佑勇李俊

机构地区东南大学法学院南昌科技大学法学院

出处《行政法学研究》 CSSCI 2007年第1期1-6,67,共7页 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

关键词行政裁量契约理念和解制度 Administrative Discretion Contract Idea Reconciliation System

分类号 D912.1 [政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1王锡锌.规则、合意与治理——行政过程中ADR适用的可能性与妥当性研究[J].法商研究,2003,20(5):67-76. 被引量：76
2段炜.《特别关注：台湾微软垄断案始末》．http://www. ce. cn/cyst/it/xwy/xwyj/gj/t20040325_518499.shtml.
3[美]欧内斯特·盖尔霍恩罗纳德·M 利文黄列译.《行政法和行政程序概要》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1996年版.第219页.
4Schwartz, Administrative Law, 263 (1977)
5罗传贤.《美国行政程序法论》，台湾五南图书出版公司,1985年版，第88页.
6[美]欧内斯特·盖尔霍恩等.《行政法和行政程序概要》，黄列译，中国社会科学出版社,1996年版，第99页.
7杨建顺.行政强制中的和解——三环家具城案的启示[J].南通师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）,2002,18(1):38-42. 被引量：30
8[德]哈特穆特·毛雷尔高家伟译.《行政法学总论》[M].法律出版社,2000年版.第156—157页.
9翁岳生编.《行政法(2000)》(下册)，中国法制出版社，2002年版，第1362页，第1447页，第1448页，注释①,第1363页，注释①,第1363页,第1364页，注释②.

二级参考文献27

1[美]史蒂文·苏本玛格瑞特·伍蔡彦敏徐卉译.《美国民事诉讼的真谛》[M].法律出版社,2002年版.31页.
2U.S. Code, vol.28, sec. 651(a).
3Thomas F. Gibbons,ADR Use by Government Agencies, Alternative Dispute Resolution Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education,Published in cooperation with the Center for Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems, August, 2001.
4Gelhom,Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution in Government: A Sense of Perspective, 1 Administrative Law Journal, pp. 459 - 460(1987).
5Willard, Uses for Alternative Dispute Resolution: Better Ways to Resolve Some Public Sector Controversies, 1 Administrative Law Journal, pp. 479 - 493 (1987).
65. U. S. C. A 571-583.
7Thomas F. Gibbons, ADR Use by Government Agencies, Alternative Dispute Resolution Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education, Published in cooperation with the Center for Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution Systems, August,2001.
85 U. S. C. A. 554(c).
9NLRB v. Oehoa Fertilizer Corp. , 368 U. S. 318, 322(1961).
10United States v. Hooker Chemicals and Plastics Corp. , 540 F. Supp. 1067, 1072.