期刊文献+

论对行政裁量相关考虑的审查 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
作者 余凌云
出处 《中外法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第6期735-745,共11页 Peking University Law Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Cf. David Herling, " Weight in Discretionary Decision - malting"(1999) 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 591.
  • 2Cf. Andrew Le Sueur, Javan Herberg & Rosalind English, Principles of Public Law, London. Sydney, Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1999, p.241. Cf. Michael Supperstone QC & James Goudie QC, Judicial Review, London, Dublin and Edinburgh, Butterworths,1997, pp.5.35 - 5.37.
  • 3Cf.Andrew Le Sueur and Mauriee Sunkin, Public Law, London and New York. Longman, 1997, p.567.
  • 4Cf. Michael Supperstone QC & James Goudie QC, op. Cit., pp. 5.36 - 5.37.
  • 5Cf. Hilary Delany, Judicial Review of Administrative Action - A Comparative Analysis, Dublin, Round Hall Sweet & Maxwell,2001, p.56.
  • 6Cf. G. D. S. Taylor, "Judicial Review oflmproper Purposes and Irrdevant Considerations"(1976) Cambridge Law Journal 283-284. Cf. G. D. S. Taylor, Judicial Review: A New Zealand Perspective, Butterworths, 1991, p.334.
  • 7Cf. Michael Supperstone QC & James Goudie QC, op. Cit., p. 5.38.
  • 8Cf. de Smith, Woolf! & Jowell, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, London. Sweet & Maxwell, 1995, p.347. Cf. G.D. S. Taylor, "Judicial Review of Improper Purposes and Irrelevant Considerations"(1976) Cambridge Law Journal277, 290.
  • 9Cf. G. D. S. Taylor, "Judicial Review of Improper Purposes and Irrelevant Considerations" ( 1976 ) Cambridge Law Journal290.
  • 10Cf. G. D. S. Taylor, op. Cit., pp.329-330.p.328.p.332.p.333.

同被引文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部