期刊文献+

基于奇异值分解的多评价结论集结方法 被引量:11

A Multi-evaluation Conclusion Aggregation Method Based on Singular Value Decomposition
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对综合评价中存在的“多评价结论非一致性”问题,提出了一种基于奇异值分解的多评价结论集结方法.对多个不一致评价结论组成的数值矩阵进行奇异值分解,并通过对定义的一致度与可信度两个性能指标的均衡确定出需保留奇异值的个数,运用奇异值分解的原理求出原评价结论的近似结论矩阵,而近似结论是对原有结论的优化.该方法具有提取多评价结论共性信息、削弱极端评价结论影响及对集结过程进行柔性控制等特点.最后,用一个算例验证了方法的有效性. A multi-evaluation conclusion aggregation method based on SVD (singular value decomposition) is put forward aiming at the inconsistency between the evaluation conclusions drawn by different methods. In this way, the SVD is done for the numerical matrix composed of multiple inconsistency conclusions. Then, the number of singular values to be kept are determined by equilibrating the two defined performance indices, i.e., consistency and reliability. Based on the principle of singular value decomposition, an approximate conclusion matrix is given as the optimization of original conclusions. The method has advantages of picking up common information from multi-evaluation, weakening the impact due to extreme evaluation conclusions and controlling flexibly the aggregation process. A numerical example is given to verify the validity of the method.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期278-281,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70472032)
关键词 综合评价 奇异值分解 组合评价 一致度 可信度 comprehensive evaluation singular value decomposition (SVD) combined evaluation consistency reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1王宗军.综合评价的方法、问题及其研究趋势[J].管理科学学报,1998,1(1):73-79. 被引量:243
  • 2Smith M F.Evaluation:review of the past,preview of the future[J].Evaluation Practice,1994,15(2):215-227.
  • 3Saaty T L.Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process[M].Princeton:RWS Publications,1994:1-127.
  • 4Hwang C L,Yoon K.Multiple attribute decision making and applications[M].Berlin:Springer Press,1981:52-56,99-103,128-139.
  • 5Charnes A,Cooper W W,Rhodes E.Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J].European Journal of Operations Research,1978,12(6):429-444.
  • 6Chen S J,Hwang C L.Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making[M].Berlin:Springer Press,1992:1-287.
  • 7Gregory A J.The road to integration:reflections on the development of organizational evaluation theory and practice[J].International Journal of Management Science,1996,24(3):295-370.
  • 8陈国宏,李美娟.基于方法集的综合评价方法集化研究[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(1):101-105. 被引量:111
  • 9郭亚军,易平涛.一种基于整体差异的客观组合评价法[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(3):60-64. 被引量:61
  • 10汪应洛.系统工程理论、方法与应用[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2002:144-176.

二级参考文献48

共引文献379

同被引文献165

引证文献11

二级引证文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部