期刊文献+

“批评”的延伸

Extending a Critical Space:Question of the Category of ‘China’ and the ‘West’
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 从某种意义上说,这篇短文与其说是对“批评的演化”(以下简称”批评”)的评论,倒不如说是在原文基础上的“借题发挥”。在认同”批评”对文化交流的积极立场和“距离化”视野的同时.本文希望借此重新思考建筑和文化领域中”中西方”类别化区分的问题.即其所带来的对文化和个体差异的简化,以及对认识特定建筑问题的阻碍。 The terms ‘China' and the ‘west' appearing in political-cultural discourses and architectural discussions have been problematic, Since the emergence of modern Chinese architecture that can be traced back to the 1920s, the prevalent pursuit has been in favour of'Chinese characteristic architecture' as opposing to the 'western' architecture. Legitimated by political ideology, the orthodoxy idea of 'Chinese characteristic architecture' has prevented architecture in China from developing its own critical discourse.The consequence of this is a stagnated architectural judgement and practice caught in a direct symbolism between form and content.This has been an obstacle in the development of Chinese architect's own responses and innovative appropriation of imported knowledge beyond simply an invention of new form.
作者 李华
出处 《时代建筑》 2006年第5期78-80,共3页 Time + Architecture
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1杨念群.美国中国学研究的范式转变于中国史研究的现实处境,中国研究的范式问题讨论,北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003:289-314.
  • 2赵国文.中国近代建筑史论[J].建筑师,1987,(28).
  • 3Said,Ew,Orientalism New York,Vintage Books,1978.
  • 4Koolhaas,R,Delirious New York,1978.
  • 5Koolhaas,R,S.Boeri,et al.Mutations.Barcelona,Actar.Arc en reve Centre d'architecture 2000.
  • 6Koolhaas,R,J.Inaba,et al.Great Leap Forward,Taschen GmbH,2001.
  • 7Koolhaas,R.and B.Mau.S,M,L,XL:small,medium,large,extra-large / Office for Metropolitan Architecture.New York,Monacelli Press,1995.
  • 8Lecture:Supercrit:Rem Koolhaas on Delirious New York,University of Westminster,London,05 May 2006.
  • 9Kubo,M,Prat,R,ed,Seattle Public Library:OMA/LMN,Barcelona:Actar,2005.
  • 10Evans,R.Translations from Drawing to Building and Other Essays,London:Architectural Association,1997,Architectural Association,Prospectus:1975-1976,(Intermediate Unit 4) pp.41.

二级参考文献8

  • 1朱涛.“建构”的许诺与虚设——论当代中国建筑学发展中的“建构”观念[J].时代建筑,2002,45(5):30-33. 被引量:64
  • 2王群.解读弗兰普顿的“建构文化研究”[J].A+D,2001,(1):69-80.
  • 3Frampton, Kenneth: "Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance", 《Labour, work and architecture》P77-89, Phaidon Press, 2002
  • 4Frampton, Kenneth: "Rappta I'Ordre:The Case for the Tectonic", 《Labour, work and architecture》 P91 - 103,Phaidon Press,2002
  • 5王群."解读弗兰普顿的《建构文化研究之二》"[J].A+D建筑与设计,2001,2:69-80.
  • 6王群教授.解读弗兰普顿《建构文化研究》[J].A+D建筑与设计,2001,:69-79.
  • 7Frampton, Kenneth: "Rappla I'Ordre: The Case for the Tectonic",《Labour,work and architecture》P93,Phaidon Press,2002.."ArchitectureDesign",Vou.60.34,1990 P19-25.
  • 8王群教授.解读弗兰普顿《建构文化研究》(二)[J].A+D建筑与设计,2001,:69-80.

共引文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部