摘要
清代汉学引人注目,相关研究成果不断涌现。但这些成果在论述和评价汉学时,往往以章太炎、梁启超于清末民初所作清代学术史著作为基点,而对晚清时期宗宋学者的论述不甚在意。实际上,由于汉学乃相对于宋学而言,宗宋学者对汉学的评论虽有门户成见,但因处于相同或相近的历史环境,面对共同的社会历史问题,因此在问题意识、思维方式以及治学理念、原则、方法等方面的看法,自有现代学者不同甚至不及之处。
Achievements on the Ancient Classics study in Qing dynasty have been made incessantly, but most of them are based on the works by Zhang Taiyan and Liang Qichao, and paid no attention to the studies of the Cheng-Zhu Confucian School of Late Qing. In fact, the ancient classics was comparative to the idealist philosophy (Li Theory, or Neo-Confucianism), and they had the same history environment, so the criticism and comments in aspects of question ideology, thread of thought, academic concept and methodology by the Cheng-Zhu Confucian School of Late Qing, had their values which were different from the modern scholars’ in spite of its prejudice. It’s worth thinking the relationship between knowledge and morality, identification and doctrine, truth and practice, which were mentioned by the Cheng-Zhu Confucian School of Late Qing.
出处
《史学理论研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第1期98-107,共10页
Historiography Bimonthly
