期刊文献+

缓慢性心律失常老年患者冠状动脉造影分析 被引量:7

The analysis of coronary angiography in old patients with bradyarrhythmias
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨选择性冠状动脉造影对Ⅱ度以上房室传导阻滞(AVB)和病态窦房结综合征(SSS)老年患者病因诊断的临床意义。方法:将70例因缓慢性心律失常已安装永久起搏器的患者分为AVB组(28例)和SSS组(42例),分别行选择性冠状动脉造影,分析左前降支(LAD)、左旋支(LCx)、右冠状动脉(RCA)的病变,血管内径狭窄达50%以上者为造影结果阳性。结果:AVB组造影结果阳性者21例(75.0%),SSS组造影阳性者13例(31.0%),两组比较差异有非常显著性意义(P<0.01);同时AVB组病变血管主要是RCA(53.6%),SSS组主要是LAD(23.8%),两组RCA的累及率比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:冠心病为Ⅱ度以上AVB老年患者的主要病因,但并非SSS的主要病因。对Ⅱ度以上AVB的老年患者,需行冠状动脉造影检查,以进一步指导治疗。而对SSS的老年患者,不宜轻易诊断为冠心病而给予不必要的治疗。 Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the incidence of coexistent coronary artery diseases(CAD) in patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmias, including sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and atrioventricular block ( AVB ). Methods:Seventy patients implanted pacemaker due to SSS and AVB were performed coronary angiography for frequent attack of suspected angina. Results : The cornonay angiography (CAG) show the incidence of CAD was 75.0% and 31.0% in CAD patients and SSS patients, respectively. The right coronary artery (RCA) was more involved in patients with AVB than the ones with SSS( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : AVB was the consequence of coronary heart disease , while SSS was not. It was still careful of coronary angiography in the patients of SSS.
出处 《医学研究生学报》 CAS 2007年第1期61-63,共3页 Journal of Medical Postgraduates
关键词 病态窦房结综合征 房室传导阻滞 冠状动脉造影 Sick sinus syndrome Atrioventricular block Coronary angiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献20

  • 1何松清,江时森.血清MMP-2、CRP水平对不稳定性心绞痛的诊断及预后判断价值[J].医学研究生学报,2001,14(4):316-318. 被引量:3
  • 2彭健,刘伊丽,贾满盈,翁昌鸿,侯玉清,张远慧,牛序芳,陈厚柏.不稳定性心绞痛的临床特点和冠状动脉造影结果分析[J].心肺血管病杂志,1996,15(2):74-76. 被引量:4
  • 3[1]李占全主编.冠状动脉造影与临床[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2002.90-124.
  • 4[5]Rutten FH,Kessels AGH,Willems FF et al.Electrocardiography in primary care;is it useful?[J] Int J Cardiol,2000,74:199-205.
  • 5[6]Goegrls APM,Vos MA,Mulleneer R et al.Value of the electrocardiaogram in diagnosing the number of severely narrowed coronary arteries in rest angina pectoris[J].Am J Cardiol,1993,72(1):999-1003.
  • 6[1]Serruys PW,Jaegere PD,Kiemeneij F et al.A comparison of balloon-expadable-stent implatation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease[J].N Engl J Med,1994,331(8):489-495.
  • 7[2]Fischman DL,Leon MB,Baim D et al.A randomized comparison of coronary –stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease[J].N Engl J Med,1994,331(8):496-501.
  • 8[3]Remers B,Mario CD,Francesco LD et al.New approach to quantitative angiographic assessment after implantation [J].Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1997,40(6):343-347.
  • 9[4]Sidney CS,James TD,Morton JK et al.ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of 1993 PTCA guidelines) –executive summary [J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,37(8):2215-2238.
  • 10[5]Graham MM,Faris PD,Ghali WA et al.Validation of three myocardial jeopardy scores in a population-based cardiac catheterization cohort[J].Am Heart J,2001,142(2):254-261.

共引文献13

同被引文献39

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部