期刊文献+

军队医学科研设备综合效益评价指标权重研究 被引量:4

Study on Weights of Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Indexes of Military Medicine Scientific Research Equipments
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:研究军队医学科研设备综合效益评价指标的权重。方法:采用德尔菲法和群体分层分析法。结果:对问卷调查各评价指标打分的结果进行矩阵合并处理得出机时利用率、科研成果、人才培养、服务收入、功能开发与利用的权重分别为0.32、0.27、0.21、0.12和0.08。结论:权重是综合评价中的重要组成部分,合理地分配权重是量化评价的关键。 Objective: To study on weights of comprehensive benefit evaluation indexes of army medicine scientific research equipments. Methods: Delphi Methodand GAHP method were applied. Results: Grade the results of questionnaire survey with matrix merge process and obtain weights of five indexes. The weight of utility rate of machines each hour, scientific research results, talented person education, service incomes, function is 0.32, 0.27, 0.21,0.12 and 0.08 respectively. Conclusions: weight is an important part of comprehensive evaluation, so assigning it in reason is the key of ration evaluation.
出处 《解放军医院管理杂志》 2006年第8期695-696,共2页 Hospital Administration Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基金 全军医学科研"十五"计划资助项目(面上项目 02M026)
关键词 军队医学科研设备 综合效益 评价指标 权重 military medicine scientific research equipment comprehensive benefit evaluation index weight
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献88

  • 1杨一风,范兰英,范晨芳.军队医学科研项目评价指标体系的构建[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2002,9(1):14-16. 被引量:12
  • 2朱宝璋.关于灰色系统基本方法的研究和评论[J].系统工程理论与实践,1994,14(4):52-60. 被引量:81
  • 3吴云燕 华中生.基于AHP的群决策判断矩阵不一致性判定和调整方法[J].系统工程,.
  • 4Levine P, Pomerol J C. PRIAM, an interactive program for choosing among multiple attribute alternatives[J]. European Journal of Operations Research, 1986, 25(2): 272-280.
  • 5Grabowski M R,Wallace W A. An expert system for maritime pilots: Its design and assessment using gaming[J]. Management Science, 1993, 3(12): 1506-1520.
  • 6Booker L,Goldberg D E, Holland J H.Classifier system and genetic algorithms[J]. Artificial Intellifence, 1989, 40(9): 1-3.
  • 7Dagli C,Schierholt K. Stock market prediction using different neural network classification architectures[A]. In: IEEE/IAFE 1996 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering[C]. 1996. 72-78.
  • 8Zeigler. Theory of Modeling and Simulation[M]. London: John Wiley & Sons Press, 1976. 45-152.
  • 9Kittock J E. Emergent conventions and the structure of multi-agent systems[A]. In: The Economy as an Evolving Complex System[M]. New Mexico: Addison Wesley Press, 1993. 371-383.
  • 10Hamiton, Nash, Pooch. Distributed Simulation[M]. Washington: CRC Press, 1997. 376-457.

共引文献756

同被引文献41

引证文献4

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部