期刊文献+

0.375%左旋布比卡因与0.375%布比卡因用于肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的比较

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较0.375%左旋布比卡因和0.375%布比卡因用于肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的效果及安全性。方法40例择期行上肢手术的病人,随机分为两组,分别用0.375%左旋布比卡因(LB组)和0.375%布比卡因(B组)行肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞。观察心率(HR)、无创血压(NIBP)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)、呼吸频率(RR);两组的感觉阻滞起效时间、感觉阻滞完全起效时间、运动阻滞起效时间、运动阻滞完全起效时间和恢复时间;麻醉效果和术中辅助用药情况;神经阻滞后的并发症和不良反应。结果LB组的感觉阻滞起效时间短于B组,且有显著性差异(p<0.05);两组的感觉阻滞完全起效时间、运动阻滞起效时间、运动阻滞完全起效时间和恢复时间均无显著性差异(p>0.05)。LB组有17例阻滞完善,有3例阻滞不全,需辅助用药完成手术;B组有16例阻滞完善,有4例阻滞不全,需辅助用药完成手术,两组相比无显著性差异(p>0.05)。两组各时间点的HR、NIBP、SpO2、RR无显著性差异,LB组无并发症和不良反应,B组有2例发生心动过缓,1例出现嗜睡。结论0.375%的左旋布比卡因用于臂丛神经阻滞可产生与0.375%的布比卡因相似的麻醉效果,更具安全性和可选性。
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2006年第12期73-73,106,共2页 Hainan Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1王向兵,曾因明.左布比卡因的药代学、药效学特性及其毒性[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2004,25(4):223-226. 被引量:67
  • 2Cheng CR,Su Th,Hung Ye et al.A comparative study of the safety and efficacy of 0.5% levobupivacine and 0.5% bupivacine of repidural anesthesia in subuects undergoing elective caesarean section[J].Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica,2002,40:13-20.
  • 3Chang DHT,Ladd LA,Wilson KA,et al.Tolerability of large-dose intravenous levobupivacaine in sheep[J].Anesth Analg,2000,91:671-679.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Eyres RR, Chalkiadis GA, Austin S. Efficacy and safety of caudal injection of levobupivacaine, 0.25%, in children under 2 years of age undergoing inguinal hernia repair, circumcision or orchidopexy. Paediatr Anaesth, 2003,13:114-121.
  • 2Morrison SG, Dominguez JJ, Frascarolo P, et al. A comparison of the electrocardiographic cardiotoxic effects of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaire, and ropivacaine in anesthetized swine. Anesth Analg, 2000, 90:1308-1314.
  • 3Ladd LA, Chang DH, Wilson KA, et al. Effects of CNS site-directed carotid arterial infusions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in sheep. Anesthesiology, 2002,97: 418-428.
  • 4Chang DHT, Ladd LA, Wilson KA, et al. Tolerability of large-dose intravenous levobupivacaine in sheep. Anesth Analg,2000,91:671-679.
  • 5Stewart J, Kellett N, Castro D. The central nervous system and cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in healthy volunteers.Anesth Analg, 2003,97: 412-416.
  • 6Kopacz DJ, Allen HW, Thompson GE. A comparison of epidural levobupivacaine 0.75% with racemic bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg,2000,90:642-648.
  • 7Bader AM, Tsen LC, Camann WR, et al. Clinical effects and maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of 0.5 % epidural levobupivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology, 1999,90:1596-1601.
  • 8Camorcia M, Capogna G. Epidural levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combination with sufentanil in early labour: a randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2003,20:636-639.
  • 9Ivani G, De Negri P, Lonnqvist PA, et al. A comparison of three different concentrations of levobupivacaine for caudal block in children. Anesth Analg, 2003,97: 368-371.
  • 10Atanassoff PG, Aouad R, Hartmannsgruber MW, et al. Levobupivacaine 0.125% and lidocaine 0.5% for intravenous regional anesthesia in volunteers. Anesthesiology, 2002,97: 325-328.

共引文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部