摘要
具有不同主体身份的共同犯罪人非法占有公共财产,如何定性处罚,刑法学界长期以来对此问题争论不休,存在分别定罪说、主犯决定说、实行犯决定说、贪污共犯特别规定说及区别对待说等诸多理论观点,至今难有定论。实务部门可遵循的立法和司法解释又存在适用上的歧义。为此,应当以部分犯罪共同说为理论基础,针对不同主体身份的共同犯罪人非法占有公共财产的犯罪定性,确立一个明确而又易于实践操作的判定依据。
If conspiratorial criminals who have rent corpus identifications occupy the public property illegally, how to certain its feature and carry out the punishment？ The criminal law circles debate on this issue endlessly for long time. There exist many theories, such as respective trial, the main offender, the doer depending, special regulation on corruption conspiratorial criminals, and treat separately, etc., and they are difficult to have a conclusion. There is a disagreement between the legislation and judicial explanations. For this, a definitive and easily feasible judge measure should be set up according to these criterions.
出处
《新疆警官高等专科学校学报》
2006年第3期42-47,共6页
Journal of Xinj iang Police Officers’Academy
关键词
共同犯罪
非法占有
公共财产
定性
conspiritrual crime
illegal occupancy
public property
identification
