摘要
目的评价不同治疗方法对慢性牙周炎的临床效果。方法对90例慢性牙周炎患者,随机分成三组:龈上洁治术+抗生素组(A组),单纯龈上洁治术组(B组)和单纯抗生素组(C组)。分别给予不同的治疗,在治疗后1周、2周和4周记录牙周袋探诊深度(PPD)、探诊附着水平(PAL)、菌斑指数(PLI)、龈沟出血指数(SBI)。结果治疗1周和2周后各指标显著减轻(P<0.05),2周比1周减轻更明显(P<0.05),4周与2周比较无明显差异(P>0.05),A组各指标减轻比B组显著(P<0.05);B组比C组疗效显著(P<0.05)。结论A组作用优于B组(P<0.05),B组优于C组(P<0.05)。
Objective To evaluate the effect of different therapies on the 90 chronic periodontitis patients. Methods Ninety patients with chronic periodontitis were detached into three groups： the group treated with the periodontal initial treatment ＆ the antibiotics, the group was treated with the periodontal initial treatment, the group treated with the antibiotics. Clinical parameters including probing pocket depth （PPD）, probing attachment level （PAL）, plaque index （PLI） and sulcus bleeding index （SBI） were recorded at baseline and each re-exam ination point. Results Levels of all index reduced after treatment （P〈0.05）, the level decreased more at two weeks and four weeks than the one week （P〈0.05）, that didn＇t show much difference between that of two weeks and four weeks （P〉0.05）. Compared with the group treated with periodontal initial treatment the level of the antibiotics ＆ the periodontal initial group decreased more （P〈0.05）. Compared with the antibiotics group the level of the periodontal initial treatment group decreased more （P〈0. 05）. Conclusions The periodontal initial treatment ＆ the antibiotics were better than the periodontal initial treatment （P〈0.05）, the periodontal initial treatment was better than the antibiotics groups （P〈0.05）.
出处
《福建医药杂志》
CAS
2006年第4期13-14,共2页
Fujian Medical Journal
关键词
慢性牙周炎
牙周基础治疗
临床分析
Periodontitis
Periodontal initial treatment
Clinical analysis
