摘要
陪审制度,世界上最古老的司法制度之一,是公民直接参与司法活动的民主形式和公民权利的保障机制。它经过延绵千年的发展与成熟,仍然受到很多国家的青睐。从世界范围来看,陪审制度主要有两种形式:英美法系陪审团制和大陆法系参审制。我国现行的人民陪审员制从性质上讲隶属后者。陪审制度正式形成于英国,随殖民统治者移植到美国后,在美国个人主义文化基础上得到了迅速的生长。陪审制度在美国是一项宪法性制度,它的意义不仅体现在保持审判公正,防止司法专断上,更反映在它的“寓权于民”的政治统治思想中,美国人甚至称它为“将裁决权置于被统治者手中”的制度。笔者运用比较分析法将我国人民陪审员制和美国陪审制度进行比较研究,指出两种制度在历史发展基础、文化基础、形式以及保障措施方面的区别,期望以此对我国人民陪审员制的模式选择有所参考和借鉴。
The Jury System, the safeguard of individual and the method of people＇s direct participation in judicial actions, is one of the oldest judiciary in the world. After thousands of years＇ development, it is still very popular in many countries. There are two main types of Jury System, one is the Jury System in the AngloAmerican law family, the other is the Assessors System in the RomanoGermanic law family. People＇s Accessorystem of China belongs to the latter by the nature. The Jury System originated in England formally and has got rapid development on the base of American individualism culture after it was transplanted into American with the colonists. It is a kind of constitutional right in America, and its significance not only lies in maintaining the judicial fairness and preventing judicial, but also in the political idea-put the rights into people＇s hands. Then, the author uses the method of comparative analysis to compare American Jury System with China＇s Accessory System and points out the difference in history origin, culture base, formation and protective ways to aid China＇s reform.
出处
《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》
2006年第3期58-60,共3页
Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词
人民陪审员
美国陪审制度
比较研究
people＇s accessory
American jury-system
comparative research
