摘要
目的:评价不同方案训练对新兵耐力及运动成绩的影响,为优化部队体能训练方案提供理论依据。方法:72名健康男性新兵随机被分为现行训练组、有氧耐力组、无氧耐力组,均进行连续8周训练。分别于训练前、训练4周末、训练8周末进行最大耗氧量(VO2max)、台阶试验及PWC150耐力指标测定和3 000 m、50 m跑考核。结果:与训练前相比,3个组别所有指标均随时间显著进行性提高。且至训练8周末有氧耐力组台阶指数、VO2max3、000 m成绩显著优于现行训练组(P值分别为0.013、0.029、0.001);无氧耐力组台阶指数、50 m跑成绩显著优于现行训练组(P分别为0.012、0.026);各组间PWC150无显著差异。结论:科学、合理、规范的耐力训练更利于提高战士耐力素质,基层部队应根据担负任务特点有针对性的加强有氧耐力和/或无氧耐力训练。
Objective：To evaluate the effects of different kinds of training on endurance capacity of recruits in order to provide a scientific basis for optimizing the project of the army＇s physical fitness training.Methods： 72 healthy male recruits were randomly divided into common military training group, aerobic endurance group and anaerobic enduranoe group. All of thei- training time was 8 weeks Their VO2max, PWC150, step test were measured before training and after trained 4 weeks and 8 weeks, respectively, as well as the achievement of their 3 000 m and 50 m running.Results：Compared with pre- training, all training achievements in every group were significant hetter. At the end of the 8th week, the step indes, VO2max and the achievement of 3 000 m naming in aerobic training group were higher than those in the common group（p was 0. 013, 0. 029 and 0. 001, respectively）. The step index and the achier of 50 m running in anaerobic group were higher titan those in the common group（p was 0. 012 and 0. 026, respectively）. There was no significant difference of PWC150 among the three groups. Conclusion： Scientific, reasonable and normative endurance training is more helpful for building up soldiers endurance capacity.
出处
《西南国防医药》
CAS
2006年第4期376-378,共3页
Medical Journal of National Defending Forces in Southwest China
基金
第三军医大学军事医学创新预研基金(XJYY200305)
关键词
训练
耐力
影响
training, endurance, physical capacity
