期刊文献+

地质灾害预报预警水平的评价 被引量:5

Review of effectiveness on geological hazard forecast and early warning
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 预报预警是防灾减灾的重要手段。目前,我国及各省(直辖市)、自治区广泛开展了地质灾害-气象预报预警工作。因此,对其水平进行科学评价已成为一个重要的研究课题。论文在前人研究的基础上,分析我国地质灾害预报预警现状及对预报预警水平评价时存在的问题,用预报预警成功率衡量预报预警水平,并建立系统的地质灾害预报预警水平评价体系;从地质灾害预报预警需解决的基本问题出发,在充分考虑地质灾害发生“时、空、强”3要素的预报预警范围对预报预警成功率的影响后,相继建立了地质灾害“时、空、强”预报预警成功率、某次灾害预报预警成功率及某时段内地质灾害预报预警成功率模型;在该模型基础上,分别建立某次及某时段内地质灾害预报预警水平整体评价模型。论文提出的评价体系及评价模型符合我国目前地质灾害预报预警现状,为地质灾害预报预警水平评价提供了一条思路。 Accurate forecast and warning is an effective measure to avoid and mitigat loss caused by geological hazard. Much work has been doing on geological hazard forecast and warning in our country. So scientific evaluation of geological hazard forecast and warning level becomes an important question for discussion. However, many problems were found in current evaluation system of geological hazard forecast and warning level in the former research. In order to solve out these problems and to evaluate the forecast and warning level scientifically, in this article, successful rate of geological hazard forecast and warning was adopted and an integrated evaluation system was introduced. As we all know, the content of the forecast and warning of geological hazards generally includes three elements such as occurring time, space and magnitude, what's more, the forecast and warning scope of theses three elements affect the forecast and warning level. So in this article three forecast and warning evaluation models of these three elements were respectively established at first. Then on the basis of the three evaluation models, an integrated evaluation model was established, which includes both the evaluation of one geological hazard occurred at certain time and evaluation of all the geological hazards occurred at certain time interval, such as one quarter or one year. The evaluation model of geological hazard forecast and warning level introduced in this article accords with the current level of our country and therefore it has certain reference value to evaluate the level of geological hazard forecast and warning.
作者 倪化勇
出处 《中国地质灾害与防治学报》 CSCD 2006年第2期130-133,共4页 The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control
关键词 地质灾害 预报预警 水平评价 地质灾害“时、空、强”预报 成功率 geological hazards forecast and warning evaluation of technique level successful rate of spatial,temporal and intensity forecat for geological hazards
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1陈运泰.地震预测研究概况[J].地震学刊,1993,13(1):17-23. 被引量:27
  • 2丁国瑜.地震预报与活断层分段[J].地震学刊,1993,13(1):8-10. 被引量:23
  • 3黄世奇.1991.预报成败的评定方法[A].见:国家地震局科技监测司编.地震预报方法实用化研究文集综合预报专辑[C].北京:地震出版社,413~415
  • 4朱成熹,朱令人,郑兴树.1991.地震预测有效性的统计检验和统计效率值研究[A].见:国家地震局科技监测司编.地震预报方法实用化研究文集综合预报专辑[C].北京:地震出版社,389~405
  • 5Aceves R L,Park S K,Straus D J.1996.Statistical evaluation of the VAN method using the historic earthquake catalog in Greece[J].Geophys Res Lett,23: 1 425~1 428
  • 6Geller R.1996.Debate on evaluation of the VAN method: Editor's introduction[J].Geophys Res Lett,23: 1 291~1 293
  • 7Geller R,Jackson D,Kangan Y,et al.1997.Earthquake cannot be predicted[J].Science,275: 1 616~1 617
  • 8Kagan Y Y.1996.VAN earthquake prediction--an attempt at statistical evaluation [J].Geophys Res Lett,23: 1 315~1 318
  • 9Kagan Y Y.1997.Statistical aspects of Parkfield earthquake sequence and Parkfield prediction experiment[J].Tectonophysics,270: 207~219
  • 10Ma Zongjin,Fu Zhengxiang,Zhang Yingzhen,et al.1989.Earthquake Prediction [M].Beijing: Seismological Press and Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag,1~332

共引文献55

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部