摘要
在哲学解释学兴起以后,法学家已开始将独断解释与探究解释的方法结合起来使用,思维的融贯性被抬到很高的位置,传统的解释理论已被论证理论所取代。但从法律思维的主流倾向看,法律思维仍然表现为在不背离法治原则的前提下对法律灵活运用。解释学的转向并没有从根本上摆脱根据法律进行思维的模式。这构成了日常思维与法律思维的根本区别。日常思维与法律思维的界限并不是恒定的,在法治社会中二者是相互影响并不断变化的,但这种变换主要是通过提升日常生活的法律性来实现的。
Ever since the rising of philosophy hermeneutics, jurists have been connecting the means of dogmatic interpretation and inquiry interpretation. And what＇s more, the coherence of thought has been uplifted to a high position, and the traditional interpretation theory has been replaced by the argumentation theory. However, seen from its primary tendency, legal thought still behaves as the flexible exertion of law on the premise of no lapsing from the nomocracy principle. The turnaround of hermeneutics has not fundamentally got rid of the pattern of thought according to law. This makes up the ultimate difference between daily thought and legal thought. The boundary of daily thought and legal thought is not invariable. In a society of nomocracy, these two aspects influence mutually and change ceaselessly. But this kind of transformation is realized by promoting the legal nature of daily life.
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第4期81-86,共6页
Seeking Truth
关键词
法律思维
日常思维
法律解释
法律方法
legal thought
daily thought
legal interpretation
legal method
