“夹在中间悖论”研究被引量：29

Study on the Paradox about “Stuck-in-the-middle”

下载PDF

导出

摘要波特在《竞争战略》中提出,低成本和差异化两种优势不可兼容的“夹在中间”理论,其后一些西方战略学家针对性地提出可以兼顾低成本与差异化两种优势的整合竞争战略理论,这两种理论自相矛盾但又同时成立,本文称之为“夹在中间悖论”。本文分别研究了“夹在中间”理论和整合竞争战略理论的隐含假设及其实证依据,界定了“夹在中间悖论”的内涵,剖析了“夹在中间悖论”的成因,提出了“夹在中间悖论”的管理策略,初步解决了竞争战略研究中存在的这个理论困境。 Michael Porter put forward the theory about ＂stuck-inthe-middle＂ which means low cost advantage and differentiation advantage are not compatible. Some other strategists presented opposing evidence on ＂stuck-in-the-middle＂ and put forward the theory about integrated cost leadership/differentiation which means low cost advantage and differentiation advantage are compatible. These two kinds of theories are seemingly contradictory and can be demonstrable separately. Here, this paper calls the phenomenon ＂paradox of stuck-in-the-middle＂. The paper studies separately the hypotheses and their empirical evidences of these two kinds of theories, discusses the meaning, causes and management tactics of the paradox about ＂stuck-in-the-middle＂, and provides an elementary answer about the dilemma which puzzled competitive strategy researchers.

作者曾凡琴霍国庆

机构地区中国科学院研究生院管理学院

出处《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 2006年第3期67-72,79,共7页 Nankai Business Review

关键词竞争战略夹在中间整合竞争战略悖论 Competitive Strategy Stuck-in-the-middle Integrated Cost Leadership/Differentiation Strategy Paradox

分类号 F272 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1迈克尔·波特著陈小悦译.竞争优势[M].华夏出版社,1997,1..
2迈克尔·波特著陈小悦译.竞争战略[M].北京:华夏出版社,1997..
3迈克尔·A·希特等著，吕巍等译．战略管理—竞争与全球化(概念)．北京：机械工业出版社，2002．
4Kumar, K., Subramanian, R., Yauger, Ch.. Pure Versus Hybrid:Performance Implications of Porter's Generic Strategies. Health Care Management Review, 1997, 22(4): 47-60.
5Ward, P. T., Duray, R., Leong G. K., Sum C. C.. Business Environment, Operations Strategy, and Performance: An Empirical Study of Singapore Manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 1995, 13(2): 99-115.
6Dess, G. G., Davis, P. S.. Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1984, (27):467-488.
7Robinson, R. B., Pearce, J. A.. Planned Patterns of Strategic Behavior and Their Relationship to Business-unit Performance.Strategic Management Journal, 1988, (9): 43-60.
8Linsu, K., Yooncheol, L.. Environment, Generic Strategies and Performance in a Rapidly Developing Country: A Taxonomic Approach. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, (31):802-827.
9Miller, D., Friesen, P. H.. Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies and Performance: An Empirical Examination with American Data -Part Ⅱ: Performance Implications. Organization Studies, 1986,7(3): 255-231.
10项文彪.三星电子战略蜕变的过程及启示[J].改革与战略,2003,19(11):40-41. 被引量：3

二级参考文献19

1戴维·贝赞可戴维·德雷诺夫等.公司战略经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999..
2Michael Porter, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors [M], The free press, 1998,.
3Michael Porter, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance [ M ], The free press, 1998,.
4Michael Porter. Competitive Advantage of Nations [ M ]. The free press, 1990.
5Gordon Walker. Modem Competitive Strategy [ M ]. McGraw- Hill/Irwin, 2003.
6Frederick Betz. Managing Technological Innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change [ M ]. Wiley - Interscience, 2003.
7Michael A, Hitt, R. Duane Ireland, Robert E, Hoskisson, Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization: Concepts and Cases,6th edition [ M ]. South- Western College Pub, 2004,.
8Arthur A. Thompson, Stricldand. Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases, 13th edition [M]. Irwin/McGraw- Hill, 2003.
9Charles W. L. Hill, Gareth R. Jones. Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach, 6th edition [ M ]. 2003.
10Michael. Porter. Creating Advantage. Executive Excellence [M].1999 ( Nov).