摘要
目的评价人工流产术中两种镇痛方法的应用效果,寻找一种安全、简便、有效的镇痛方法。方法人工流产术患者300例,随机分为宫腔麻醉组、笑气麻醉组,每组150例;设对照组150例,进行镇痛效果及实际应用比较观察。结果宫腔麻醉组镇痛与笑气吸入镇痛,两者扩张宫颈时的镇痛效果分别为92%(138/150)、97%(145/150),笑气组略优于宫腔麻醉组,但两组相比无差异。两组吸宫时疼痛均为98%(147/150)。结论宫腔麻醉组便于操作和推广,适合在社区医院开展。
Objective By evaluating the effect of the ways to ease pain in two kinds of induced abortion, we want to search the best way to ease pain,which is safe,convenient and effective. Methods 300 eases of induced - abortion patients were random divided into two groups：ISO cases were used for anaesthesia of uterine cavity and nitrous oxide anaesthesia respectively, 150 cases as control group.Results The easepain effect of the two groups were 92% （138/150） in anaesthesia of uterine cavity and 97% （ 145/150） in nitrous oxide anaesthesia when the cervix was dilated respectively. The latter were better than the former, but no statistics significance. The two groups were the same as 98% （ 147/150）in uterine curettage. Conclusion The method of anaesthesia of uterine cavity was easier to operate and popular in community hospitals.
出处
《四川医学》
CAS
2006年第6期637-638,共2页
Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词
人工流产术
镇痛方法
宫腔麻醉
笑气吸入
induced abortion
ease pain
anaesthesia of uterine cavity
nitrous oxide anaesthesia
