期刊文献+

对改进高校课堂教学质量评价的几点思考 被引量:41

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前我国高校课堂教学质量评价工作在评价体系的制定、实施和评价结果利用方面存在一些不足之处,已经影响了评价工作的正常开展,为此,我们要从几个方面改进课堂教学质量评价工作,以充分发挥评价的作用。
作者 钱存阳
出处 《高等理科教育》 2006年第2期25-27,共3页 Higher Education of Sciences
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1胡祖莹,魏红.教学评价中信息来源的可靠性研究[J].教师教育研究,1996,11(3):38-43. 被引量:25
  • 2Feldman, K. A. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and extenud (neutral) observers[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1989,(30):113-135.
  • 3Marsh, H.W. Students' evaluations of university teaching:Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility[ J ]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, ( 76 ) :707-754.
  • 4Brandenburg, D. C., Slindle, J. A and Batista, E. E.Student ratings of instruction: Validity and normative interpretations[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1977,(7):67-78.
  • 5Centra, J. A. Reflective Faculty Evaluation[M]. Jossey-Bass Publishers. 1993.
  • 6Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R.P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.) Effective Teaching in Higher Education[ M]. New York: Agathon. 1997.241-320.
  • 7Feldman, K. A. Classsize and students' evaluations of college teacher and courses: A close look [ J ]. Research in Higher Education, 1984, (21) :45-116.
  • 8McKeachie, W. J. Student ratings[J]. American Psychologist, 1997,(52) :1218-1225.
  • 9Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings[J]. American Psychologist, 1997, (52) : 1209-1217.
  • 10艾尔·巴比.社会研究方法[M].北京:华夏出版社,2000..

共引文献256

同被引文献149

引证文献41

二级引证文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部