期刊文献+

初级军官心理选拔的预测性 被引量:31

Predictive Research on Psychological Selection of Cadets in Military Academy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过建立院校学员胜任特征及初级军官评价模型,探讨初级军官心理选拔检测系统的预测性。某军校340名男性本科学员入校时完成初级军官心理选拔检测,毕业前进行院校胜任特征评价,对162名学员毕业后1~5年进行部队工作表现追踪评价。结果发现:中国MBTI-G人格类型测验对院校学员管理能力、影响力、约束力、口头表达、军人气质、人际关系等有较好的预测性,预测符合率72.13%;中国军人明尼苏达个性调查表6项精神障碍维度对情绪稳定性有较好的预测,预测符合率71.90%;院校学员一般能力倾向测验对学业成绩、文字表达、口头表达、人际关系和决策能力等胜任特征也有一定的预测性,预测符合率66.70%;三项测验院校胜任特征总预测符合率达81.70%,部队胜任特征总预测符合率76%-87%。该研究为我军初级军官心理选拔提供了实用工具,为提高心理选拔预测准确性提供了科学依据。 AIM : This paper was to establish a suitable psychological selection method of cadets in military academy and to pro- vide a new idea on the study of psychological selection by analyzing the main experiences and outcomes of 13 years'study on the primary officerg psychological selection. METHOD : The competency model of cadets in military academy was built by the deductive method and Delphi expert assessment. 340 cadets from a military academy were tested with MBTI-G, MMPI-2, and Group Intelligence Test of Army Academy Students after entrance, and evaluated with the competency model of cadets in military academy before graduation. And 38 cadets were appraised on the job performance in the military after 1.5 years of graduation. RESULTS : Preferable prediction was found in 3 dimensions of MBTI-G on the competency. There were differences of personality type between the best group and the worst group, and the worst group scored higher on seven scales of MMPI-2 than the best group. Group Intelligence Test of Army Academy Students could preferably predict the factor of intelligence. The prediction efficiency of MMPI-2, MBTI-G and the intelligence test was 72.13%, 71.90% and 66.70%, and the integrative efficiency of three scales was 81.70%. The prediction efficiency on the cadets'behavior in military of the competency model was up to 76% ~ 87%. There was significant correlation between the competency model and the job performance( r =0.36 ~0.64). CONCLUSION: This study established a set of efficient psychological selection thoughts and methods for the military cadets.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第2期308-316,共9页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 全军"九五"医药卫生基金指令课题(批准号96L050) "十五"指令课题(批准号01L073)资助项目
关键词 胜任特征 心理测验 心理选拔 预测性 军官 competency, psychological test, psychological selection, prediction, cadets in militery academy.
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Jones A.The contribution of psychologists to military officers selection.In:Gal R,Mangelsdorff A D ed.Handbook of Military Psychology.New York:John Wiley & Sons Ltd,1991.37 ~56
  • 2Steege F W,Fritscher W.Psychological assessment and military personnel management.In:Gal R,Mangelsdorff A D ed.Handbook of Military Psychology.New York:John Wiley & Sons Ltd,1991.7 ~31
  • 3Zeidner J,Drucker A J.Behavioral science in the army:a corporate history of the army research institute.Alexandria,AV:US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Science,1988
  • 4Gal R,Mangelsdorff A D.Handbook of Military Psychology.New York:John Wiley & Sons Ltd,1991
  • 5Hunter J E,Hunter R F.Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.Psychological Bulletin,1984,96:72 ~ 89
  • 6Lescreve F J,Arabian J,Bailey M,et al.Officer selection.Ottawa,Canada:St.Joseph Press,2001
  • 7刘旭峰 苗丹民 王广献.《陆军院校学员团体智力测验》信度及效度分析[J].第四军医大学学报,2001,22(19):1821-1824.
  • 8苗丹民,皇甫恩,罗正学,刘旭峰,王广献,安超.MBTI人格类型量表的效标关联效度分析[J].第四军医大学学报,2000,21(11):1304-1306. 被引量:47
  • 9Quenk N L.Essentials of Mayers-Briggs Type Indicator assessment.John Wiley & Sons,Inc.Canada,2000.1~28
  • 10Graham J R.MMPI-2:Assessing personality and psychopathology (3rd ed.).New York:Oxford University Press,2000.21 ~87

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1] Moore T. Personality test are back [M]. New York: Fortune Magazine, 1987:10-12.
  • 2[2] Myers IB. Introduction to type [M]. 4th ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1987.
  • 3[3] Myers IB, MacCaulley MH. Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator [M]. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1985:31-34.
  • 4[4] Gardner WL, Martinko MJ. The relationship between psychological types, managerial behavior, and managerial effeciveness: An empirical investigation [J]. J Psychol Type,1990;19:35-43.
  • 5[5] MacDonald DA, Anderson PE, Tsagarakis CI et al. Correlations between the Myers-Briggs types indicator and the NEO personality inventory facets [J]. Psychol Rep, 1995; 76(2):449-450.
  • 6[6] Miller VG. Characteristics of intuitive nurses [J]. West J Nurs Res, 1995;17(3):305-316.
  • 7[7] Thomson NF, Martinko MI. The relationship between MBTI types and attributional style [J]. J Psychol Type, 1995;35:22-30.
  • 8[8] Mosley DC. Type profiles and managerial styles of bankers [J]. J Psychol Type, 1985;10:41-45.
  • 9[9] Cryskiewicz NP, Tullar WL. The relationship between personality type and creativity style among managers [J]. J Psychol Type, 1995;32:30-35.
  • 10Pfeffer J, Veiga J F. Putting people first for organizational success. Academy of Management Executive, 1999, 13: 37~48

共引文献693

同被引文献426

引证文献31

二级引证文献162

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部