摘要
论题指出我国诉讼时效制度的价值追求应在公平与效率的天平上更多的倾向于追求诉讼效率;诉讼时效制度的立法例,应采用分别主义的立法例;普通诉讼时效期间应设定为4年;诉讼时效的适用范围应是全部债权请求权返还财产请求权和恢复原状请求权;诉讼时效完成后的法律后果应采用胜诉权消灭主义和时效抗辩权发生主义相结合制度确定。
This article ventures to make the following propositions ： The value of the system of limitation of action in civil code of China should pursue more efficiency than equity in the weighing scale; The lawmaking example of the civil code of the system of limitation of action in civil code should adopt that of distinguishing doctrine ; The common limitation of action should be measured a 4-year-period, and applicable to the general claim ; The scope of the limitation of action should cover the duty legal right of claim, return legal right of claim , and restore legal right of claim;The kind of legal effect which takes place after negative prescription should be determined on the combined mechanism of elimination of recover in lawsuit and the efficacious state of prescription action.
出处
《海南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2006年第1期33-36,共4页
Journal of Hainan University （Humanities & Social Sciences）
关键词
诉讼时效
消灭时效
请求权
limitation of action
prescription extinctive
claim
