摘要
目的应用1985年“身高标准体重”和2003年国际生命科学会中国肥胖工作组（WCOC）制定的“中国儿童青少年超重、肥胖BMI分类标准建议”比较静安区中小学生的肥胖状况。方法2002～2004年，静安区营养监测点7-18岁的学生，分别用1985年“身高标准体重”法和WGOC标准筛选肥胖、超重，比较2种标准筛选出的肥胖学生特征。结果（1）用身高标准体重．WGOC标准筛选出的肥胖率分别为16．44％和10．51％，超重率分别为12．90％和15．31％；（2）不同年份、不同年龄、不同性别学生中。用2种标准筛选出的肥胖率和超重率存在明显不一致性；有4．41％（734／16640）的学生用身高标准体重不能进行筛选，其中男生13～17岁组占91．69％（673／734）；（3）2种标准筛选的肥胖学生均表现为小学生高于中学生，男生高于女生。结论随着我国青少年发育的快速变化，1985年身高标准体重已不能客观反映儿童青少年中的肥胖、超重水平。而WGOC标准能很好地区分正常体重、超重、肥胖学生。
Objective To compare the results of obesity status by using weight-for-height standard method and the ＂Body Mass Index （BMI） Reference Norm for Screening Overweight and Obesity in Chinese Children and Adolescents＂ made by WGOC in 2003. Methods Using weight-for-height standard method and reference standard of BMI made by WGOC, a cross-sectinnal assessment of obesity and overweight was carried out in monitoring school students aged 7 - 18 ） in Jing＇ an District, Shanghai. Two groups of obesity students＇ characteristics were compared with each other. Reselts 1 ） By using weightfur-height method and BMI, the prevalence rates of obesity were 16.44% and 10.51% and the prevalence rates of overweight were 12.90% and 15.31%. 2） The prevalence rates of obesity and overweight were significantly different using the two methods. There were 4.41% （734/16 640）of the students unable to be screened using weight-for-height method and 91.69% （673/734） were boys aged 13 - 17. 3）There were mere obesity students in primary schools than in middle schools, and more obesity students in boys than in girls with two both criteria. Conclus/on Weight-for-height standard in 1985 can not correctly reflect the status of obesity and overweight in children and adolescents, and BMI criteria made by WGOC in 2003 is a more scientific method in screening norreal, overweight and obesity students.
出处
《中国学校卫生》
CAS
北大核心
2006年第2期100-102,共3页
Chinese Journal of School Health
关键词
肥胖症
身高
体重
评价研究
参考标准
Obesity
Body height
Body weight
Evaluation studies
Reference standards
