期刊文献+

公众参与科技评价的目标与过程——以转基因技术争论为例 被引量:9

Study on the object and process of public participatory technology based on the case of genetically modified technology
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 “科技民主”的理念打破了“专家”与“普通大众”之间的界限,认为专家的意见只是社会总体决策的参考,公众应当具有参与科技决策的权力,这也为公众参与技术评价范式的兴起奠定了政治基础。本文以国外围绕转基因技术所进行的公众讨论为例,分析了公众参与科技评价的目的与过程。 As some scholars said, the emergence of the thought of "science and technology democracy" has broken the boundary between the experts and laymen. Based on the viewpoint, the public should have the power to participate the S&T decision and the advices of experts would be only the reference to social decision. Public participatory technology assessment has been considered as a means for reconstructing trust in risk management with modern technologies. The paper analyzes the object and the process of this kind of technology assessment on the basis of the dispute on the genetically modified technology.
作者 谈毅
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期30-35,共6页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70233001) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2003034025)
关键词 公众参与 技术评价 转基因 technology assessment public participation genetically modified technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1周桂田.“物竞天择”到“不自然的选择”-人类价值与自然世界[JB/OL].http://www.chinatimes.org.tw/features/biology/paper/1-3.doc,2005-04-20.
  • 2Bunders Joske,Josee van Eijndhoven.The importance of interactions in broadening the basis for decision-making on technology[J].Bull Sci Tech Soc,1987,7:687-696.
  • 3EUROPTA."European Participatory Technology Assessment:Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making."[R].Copenhagen:The Danish Board of Technology,www.tekno.dk/europta,2000-01-18.
  • 4Rowe Gene,Lynn J Frewer.Public participation methods:A framework for evaluation[J].Science,Technology & Human Value,2000,18(3):341-360.
  • 5周桂田.生物科技产业与社会风险-迟滞型高科技风险社会[R].台湾大学法律系.“基因科技之法律管制体系与社会冲击研究学术讨论会”[C].,2000..
  • 6Grin John.Rationale and praxis of interactively performed technology assessment:The example of the GIDEON project[A].European Evaluation Society.International Conference of Evaluation:Profession,Business or Politics?[R].1998.

同被引文献107

引证文献9

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部