期刊文献+

Ⅰ、Ⅱ型及复合型裂纹动态应力强度因子的有限元分析 被引量:5

Finite Element Analysis of Mixed Mode Fracture Dynamic Stress Intensity Factors
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对含有预制裂纹的中心穿透裂纹板和三点弯曲试样在动态载荷作用下进行了有限元模拟。前者裂纹面与载荷作用方向的夹角取15°~90°之间的6种情况,后者按纯Ⅰ型和纯Ⅱ型两种方式进行加载。得到了Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型动态应力强度因子的时间历程,并研究不同裂纹角对动态复合比的影响。结果表明:中心穿透裂纹板试样在15°和90°两种情况下KⅡ(t)和KⅠ(t)分剐占主导成分;45°时KⅠ(t)和KⅡ(t)基本相同;随着裂纹面与载荷夹角的增加KⅠ(t)呈增加趋势而KⅡ(t)呈先增加后减小趋势。三点弯曲试样按纯Ⅰ型加载时KⅡ(t)基本为零,按纯Ⅱ型加栽时KⅠ(t)幅值随时间而增加。 In this paper, finite element simulation of central-cracked plates with different angles between the load and the crack surface and of three-point bend specimens under impact loading are performed. The central-cracked plates are analyzed with six crack angles ranging from 15° to 90°, while the threepoint bend specimens are analyzed under two load modes Modes Ⅰ and Ⅱ Dynamic stress intensity factors (DSIF) of Modes Ⅰ and Ⅱare calculated and the effect of different crack angles on the ratio of KⅡ/KⅠ is studied. The results show that for the central-cracked plate specimen, KⅡ (t) is much lager than KⅠ (t) when the crack angle is 15° and that it is just opposite when the crack angle is 90°. KⅠ (t) and KⅡ (t) are nearly the same when the crack angle is 45°. With the increase of the crack angle, KⅠ (t) increases, while KⅠ (t) increases first and then decreases. The results of the three-point bend specimens show that under Mode Ⅱ load, KIⅠ(t) increases as time goes on, but under KⅠ load KⅡ(t) is almost zero.
出处 《机械科学与技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期123-126,共4页 Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会/中国工程物理研究院"NSAF"联合基金项目(10276033)资助
关键词 复合型裂纹 动态应力强度因子 复合比KⅡ/KⅠ mixed mode fracture dynamic stress intensity factor(DSIF) ratio of KⅡ/KⅠ
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Rokaeh I V. Modal approach for processing one-and three-point bend test data for DISF-time diagram determination, part 1-theory[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structure, 1998,21 : 1007 - 1014.
  • 2Rokach I V. Modal approach for processing one-and threepoint bend test data for DISF-time diagram determination, part 2-calculation, and result[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structure, 1998,21:1015 - 1026.
  • 3Nakano M, Kishida K. Numerical computation of dynamic stress intensity factor for impact fracture test [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,1990,36(3 ) :515 - 122.
  • 4李玉龙.利用三点弯曲试样测试材料动态起裂韧性的技术与展望[J].稀有金属材料与工程,1993,22(5):12-18. 被引量:9
  • 5Banks-sills L, Aroan M, Bui H D. Toward a pure shear specimen for KⅡc determination [J]. Int. J. Fracture, 1983,21(1):8-14.
  • 6Chang S H, Lee C I, Seokwon Jeon. Measurement of rock fracture toughness under Modes Ⅰ and Ⅱ and mixed-mode conditions by using disc-type specimens[J]. Engineering Geology ,2002,66:79 - 97.
  • 7Buchholz F G, et al. Fracture analysis and experimental results of crack growth under general mixed mode loading conditions [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2004,71:455 - 468.
  • 8Li Y L, et al. Experimental determination of dynamic fracture initiate toughness using Hopkinson pressure bar[J]. Acta Mehcanica Solida Sinica,1995 ,8 :210 -214.
  • 9李玉龙,刘元镛.三点弯曲试样动态冲击特性的有限元分析[J].计算结构力学及其应用,1995,12(1):110-115. 被引量:14
  • 10Maiti S K, Keshbat A S. Experimental and finite element study on stable crack growth in three point bending [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 1993,60:179 - 194.

二级参考文献9

  • 1A. G. Dutton,R. A. W. Mines. Analysis of the Hopkinson Pressure Bar loaded Instrumented Charpy Test using an inertial modelling technique[J] 1991,International Journal of Fracture(3):187~206
  • 2T. Yokoyama,K. Kishida. A novel impact three-point bend test method for determining dynamic fracture-initiation toughness[J] 1989,Experimental Mechanics(2):188~194
  • 3J. W. Dally,D. B. Barker. Dynamic measurements of initiation toughness at high loading rates[J] 1988,Experimental Mechanics(3):298~303
  • 4J. G. Williams,G. C. Adams. The analysis of instrumented impact tests using a mass-spring model[J] 1987,International Journal of Fracture(3):209~222
  • 5C. Ruiz,R. A. W. Mines. The Hopkinson pressure bar: an alternative to the instrumented pendulum for Charpy tests[J] 1985,International Journal of Fracture(2):101~109
  • 6J. F. Kalthoff. On the measurement of dynamic fracture toughnesses — a review of recent work[J] 1985,International Journal of Fracture(3-4):277~298
  • 7W. B?hme,J. F. Kalthoff. The behavior of notched bend specimens in impact testing[J] 1982,International Journal of Fracture(4):R139~R143
  • 8李玉龙,刘元镛.带裂纹板在冲击载荷作用下动态应力强度因子的数值计算[J].航空学报,1989,10(5). 被引量:6
  • 9李玉龙,刘元镛.用裂纹张开位移计算三点弯曲试样的动态应力强度因子[J].爆炸与冲击,1993,13(3):249-258. 被引量:9

共引文献21

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部