期刊文献+

国有资产的定性及其转让对价 被引量:19

The Nature of State-Owned Capital and Consideration in Privatization
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在国有企业的资产流动之中,由于将国有资产采用物权模式对待,过度依赖了评估机构,寻求所谓的“客观价值”,这是一种落后的静态的财产观念。这导致了中国的国有资产变成了对现值的讨价还价,忽略了转让后的期值,致使“国有资产管理”的治理模式变成了“一锤子买卖”。这种法律规则意味着国有资产变成了国家私产,是一种落后于时代的观念。国家并不是基于社会效率来持有国有资产的,国家利益替代了社会效率。采用合同的长期管理模式,完善文官制度,完善一般企业制度中的公司治理规则,本着社会本位的思想才能有效地调整和管理国有资产。 In this paper, the author points out that the theory in state owned capital (SOC) regulation takes a doctrine of continental law system's Rein right. In the transaction or privatization of State owned enterprise (SOE), the legislator wants to find an effective way to determinate the objective value of assets or enterprise. The state treat the SOC as it's private property instead of public interest. The transaction model also turns a long-term cooperative mechanism into a once-off trade. Under this legislative model, opportunism behavior, fraud conveyance, tunneling and siphoning is eroding the state owned capital. The author also criticizes the legislative regime turn the public property into the state' s private property, the social efficiency but the national interest should be the aim of privatization, which means the law should not taking too much attention to the present value, but the social effects.
作者 邓峰
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期113-123,共11页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 国有资产 转让对价 公司治理 公司法 国有企业法 公共企业 state-owned capital, corporation law, state-owned enterprise law, public enterprise, corporate governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Henry Hansmann and Reinier Kraakman, The End of History of Corporate Law, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 89, Issue 2,2001, P439.
  • 2Frank H. Easterbrook and Daniel R. Fischel, The Economics Structure of Corporate Law, Harvard University Press, 1991.
  • 3Jean Tirole, Corporate Governance, Econometrica, Vol. 69, No. 1, 2001, P1-35.
  • 4A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, A Survey of Corporate Governance, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, 1997, Pp737 -87.
  • 5邓峰.作为社团的法人:重构公司理论的一个框架[J].中外法学,2004,16(6):742-764. 被引量:74
  • 6史际春 孙虹 史际春 邓峰.论“大民事”[A].史际春,邓峰.经济法学评论(2001年第2卷)[C].北京:中国法制出版社,2002..
  • 7Rajan, Raghuram and Luigi Zingales, The Firm as a Dedicated Hierarchy: A Theory of the Origins and Growth of Firms, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, Vol. CXVI, Pp805 - 852.
  • 8Ugo Mattei, Comparative Law and Economics, University of Michigan Press. 1997.
  • 9M. M. Blair and L. A. Stout, A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 85, Pp247--328,.
  • 10张维迎 1999.从公司治理结构看中国国有企业改革[A].载:张维迎.企业理论与中国企业改革[C].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.pp97-141.

二级参考文献14

  • 1寇志新.从民法理论谈国家所有权和企业经营权的关系及其模式设想[J].西北政法学院学报,1987,9(3):20-27. 被引量:3
  • 2斯特恩.埃格特森.新制度经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996..
  • 3周其仁.产权与制度变迁[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2001..
  • 4shleifer ,vishny (1993) “corruption” quarterly journal of economics,August,1993. Olson mancur (1993) “dictationship,democracy and development” The American political science review , 9 1993 p567-576.
  • 5Frye, Timothy & Shleifer, Andrei, (1997) . “The Invisible Hand and the Grabbing Hand” American Economic Review Vol.87 (2) pp. 354-58.
  • 6Herschel I grossman (2001) “the greation of effective property rights” AEA papers and proceedings .May 2001,p347-352.
  • 7Lin,Justin yifu (1990) “collectivization and chlna's agricultural crisis in 1959-1961”,joural of political economy,vol.98,no.6 p1228-1252.
  • 8Li-an ZHOU.Grabbing Hand vs. Enabling Hand: A Comparison of China and Japan in Response to the West in late 19th Century. Perspectives, Vol. 1, No. 3.
  • 9Jiahua Che (2000) From the Grabbing Hand to the Helping Hand wdi:papers:2000-58.
  • 10边沁.政府片论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1995..

共引文献413

同被引文献292

引证文献19

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部