摘要
共识认为 ,在法律推理时仅仅依靠形式法律推理是不够的。但不同的法学家对如何弥补“不够”并不一致。本文针对辩证推理与实践推理两个理论的要义进行比较 ,以期找到在中国法律制度下的法律推理的理论模式。
Common recongnition goes that , in legal deduction, only supporting by formally legal deduction is not enough . But different lawyers disagree with how to remedy ＂not enough ＂. This paper aims at comparison between dialectical deduction and practial dedution to find out the theoretical pattern in the legal deduction under Chinese legal system.
关键词
法律推理
辩证推理
实践推理
legal deduction
dialectical deduction
practisecal deduction
