摘要
传统观点认为,行政指导是一种非权力行为,这一定论形成的深层次原因是日本法学从德国继受而来的分析法学传统。但通过社会实证分析,就会发现“事实上的强制力”和“给予好处”等保障机制使行政指导至少在一定范围内带有权力色彩,这也正是各国特别是日本加强对行政指导的法律控制的认识论基础。“非权力行为”的定性与高强度法律控制之间出现的悖论导源于两种方法论基础的冲突。
Administrative guidance is not an act of authority in traditional opinion, the deepseated reason of which is the heritance of analysis jurisprudence from Germany by Japan. However, through social analytic demonstration, we can find that administrative guidance has authority characteristic in a certain scope, which is just the basis of cognitive theory of legal regulation of administrative guidance in various countries especially Japan. The contradiction between determination of the nature of act of non - authority and high intensive legal regulation results from the conflict between two kinds of basis of cognitive theory.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
2005年第4期116-122,共7页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
