摘要
与传统的行政行为概念不同,行政指导具有非法律化、非强制性的特点。因此一般认为行政指导不可能也没必要接受司法审查。然而,日本放弃对行政行为严格的概念主义的理解,将之导入司法审查,以协调行政的灵活性、公民权利的保护和司法监督的互动关系。借鉴日本理论和实践的发展,检讨我国行政指导理论,应当明确行政指导的行为性质、深化认识以及加强程序立法,使行政指导纳入我国行政诉讼受案范围成为可能。
Unlike traditional administrative acts, administrative guidance is neither based on the law nor compulsory. Therefore, it is usually thought difficult and needless for administrative guidance to be judicially reviewed. However, Japan abandons the strict restriction of administrative scope and subsumes administrative guidance in to eo - ordinate the interaction among the flexibility of administration, the protection of civil rights and judicial review. For the sake of drawing lessons from theoretical and practical development of Japan and reviewing the own administrative guidance theory in China, the behaviour nature of administrative guidance should be made definite and the understanding of procedure legislation be deepen and strengthen. All in all, it is possible to subsume administrative guidance in scope of administrative litigation in China.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期60-64,110,共6页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
行政指导
行政诉讼
受案范围
法治
Administrative Guidance
Administrative Litigation
Scope
Rule of Law
