期刊文献+

血管超声与经导管造影诊断颈动脉狭窄的对比研究 被引量:2

Correlation of Duplex Sonography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Stenosis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:评价血管超声技术诊断颈动脉狭窄的临床应用价值.方法:对41例怀疑有颈动脉狭窄的患者行超声(US)和血管造影(DSA)检查,颈动脉狭窄应用NASCET标准测量并计算狭窄率.结果:82支颈内动脉中DSA诊断为正常血管53支、轻度~中度狭窄(≤69%)11支、重度狭窄(≥70%)10支、闭塞(100%)8支;以阴性(正常)与阳性(狭窄或闭塞)为切分点时,超声诊断的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为94.2%、90%、94.2%、90%;以血管狭窄率70%为切分点时,其敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为86.4%、72.7%、89%、66%.结论:血管超声诊断颈动脉狭窄的敏感度较高,但特异度偏低,血管超声可用于颈动脉狭窄的筛选.但对于血管重度狭窄(≥70%)拟行颈动脉内膜剥脱术或经皮颈动脉成形术的患者,术前应行DSA检查. Objective: To assess the clinical value of Duplex sonography in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. Methods: Duplex sonography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were performed in 41 patients with clinical suspected carotid stenosis. Stenosis measurement according to NASCET criteria for DSA was used and correlated with the findings of Duplex sonography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), were calculated. Results:Of the 82 carotid arteries assessed on DSA,there were normal vessel (n=53),mild to moderate stenosis (≤69%, n=11),severe stenosis (≥70% ,n=10) ,occlusion ( 100%, n=8). Taking abnormal (including occlusion and stenosis) as a cutoff point, the sensitivity, specificity,PPV,NPV was 94.2% ,90% ,94.2% ,90% ,respectively. Taking severe stenosis (≥70%) as a cutoff point, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV was 86.4%,72.7%,89%,66% respectively. Conclusion: Duplex sonography is an effective technique and could be used as a screening test for the diagnosis and follow up examination of the carotid artery stenosis. For patient with severe stenosis (≥70%), which is considered as candidate for endarterectomy and percutaneous transluminal carotid angioplasty,DSA should be performed.
出处 《放射学实践》 2005年第9期779-781,共3页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 颈动脉 超声多普勒 血管造影术 Carotid artery stenosis Duplex sonography Angiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1华扬,凌晨,段春,李慎茂,缪中荣.超声波技术对颈动脉狭窄介入治疗前后的检测分析和评价[J].中国超声医学杂志,2002,18(8):589-592. 被引量:28
  • 2Terramani TT,Hood DB,Rove VL,et al. The Utility of Preoperative Routine Carotid Artery Duplex Scanning in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2002,16 (1):163-167.
  • 3The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Benefical Effect of Carotid Endaarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with Garade Carotid Stenosis[J]. N Engl J Med,1991,325(3) :445-453.
  • 4European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: Interim Result for Symptomatic Patient with Severe (70%~90%) or Mild (0%~29%) Carotid Stenosis[J]. Lancet,1991,337(6) :1235-1243.
  • 5Nederkoorn PJ,Mali WP,Eikelboom BC,et al. Preoperative Diag nosis of Carotid Artery Stenosis (Accuracy of Noninvasive Testing) [J]. Stroke, 2002,33 (12): 2003-2008.
  • 6Cheng SW,Wu LL,Lau H,et al. Prevalence of Significant Carotid Stenosis in Chinese Patients with Peripheral and Coronary Artery Disease[J]. Aust NZ J Surg,1999,69(1) :44-47.
  • 7Steinke W, Kloetzsch C, Hennerici M, et al. Carotid Artery Disease Assessed by Color Flow Imaging: Correlation with Standard Sonography and Angiography[J]. AJNR, 1990,11(2): 259-266.
  • 8Machkenzie KM,French-Sherry E,Burns K,et al. B-Mode Ultrasound Measurement of Carotid Bifurcation Stenosis:is it Reliable?[J]. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery,2002,36(2):130-135.
  • 9Kono Y, Pinnell SP, Sirlin CB, et al. Carotid Arteries: ContrastEnhanced US Angiography Preliminary Clinical Experience [J].Radiology, 2004,230(2): 561-568.
  • 10Yoshida K,Nozaki K,Kikuta K,et al. Contrast-Enhanced Carotid Color-Coded Duplex Sonography for Carotid Stenting Follow-up Assessment[J]. AJNR,2003,24(5) :992-995.

二级参考文献1

共引文献37

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部