期刊文献+

幼儿归纳推理的依据:知觉相似性还是类别概念?

The Base of Infants' Inductive Reasoning:Perceptional Similarity or Category Concept?
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 归纳推理是人类思维的一个核心成分,也是幼儿早期概念形成和发展的基本条件。文章探讨了知觉相似性和类别概念在幼儿归纳推理中的作用。一般来讲,当幼儿缺乏关于推理对象的类别概念知识时,其归纳推理是以知觉相似性为基础的;当幼儿具备了关于推理对象的类别概念知识时,其归纳推理则会综合两种线索。 Inductive reasoning is one of the core elements of thoughts and is a basic requirement for infants' concepts forming and developing. The paper deals with the role that perceptional similarity and category concepts play in infants' inductive reasoning. It is concluded that both of them will work in infants' inferences. When infants lack of knowledge about objects, they will reason based on objects' perceptional similarity; when they are endowed with knowledge related to objects, they will reason by using the two clues.
出处 《重庆三峡学院学报》 2005年第4期70-73,共4页 Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University
关键词 幼儿 归纳推理 知觉相似性 类别概念 infant inductive reasoning perceptional similarity category concept
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[14]Osherson D N, Smith E E, Wilkie 0,Lopez A, Shafir E. Category-based Induction[J].Psychological Review, 1990, 97: 185-200.
  • 2[15]Kalish C W, Gelman S A. On wooden pillows: Multiple classification and children's category-based inductions [J]. Child Development.1992, 63: 1536-1557.
  • 3[10]SlomanS A. Feature-based induction[J].Cognitive Psychology, 1993, 25: 231-280.
  • 4[19]Andrea N W, Susan A G. The influence of shape similarity and shared labels on infants' inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties[J]. Child Development. 2001,72: 1653-1674.
  • 5[11]Heit E, Hahn U. Diversity-based Reasoning in Children[J]. Cognitive Psychology,2001, 43: 243-27.
  • 6李红,陈安涛.儿童归纳推理基础理论探索[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,31(4):103-108. 被引量:13
  • 7陈安涛,李红.儿童归纳推理基础研究综述[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2002,24(1):50-53. 被引量:3
  • 8陈安涛,李红.归纳推理心理效应的研究[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(6):607-615. 被引量:21
  • 9魏勇刚,李红.函数发现中的归纳推理研究[J].中国民航飞行学院学报,2004,15(1):3-7. 被引量:3
  • 10MandlerJ M. Representation[M].In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler, W. Damon, Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language. New York: Wiley, 1998. 199-308.

二级参考文献32

  • 1Nisbett R E, Krantz D H, Jepson C, Kunda Z. The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 1983, 90:339~363
  • 2Osherson D N, Smith E E, Wilkie O, Lopez A, Shafir E. Category-based Induction. Psychological Review, 1990, 97:185~200
  • 3Lopez A, Gelman S A, Gutheil G, Smith E E. The development of category-based induction. Child Development, 1992, 63:1070~1090
  • 4McDonald J, Samuels M, Rispoli J. A hypothesis-assessment model of categorical argument strength. Cognition, 1996, 59:199~217
  • 5Carey S. Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 1985
  • 6Choi I, Nisbett R E, Smith E E. Culture, category salience, and inductive reasoning. Cognition, 1997, 65:15~32
  • 7Lopez A, Atran S, Coley J D, Medin D L, Smith E E. The tree of life: Universal and cultural features of folkbiological taxonomies andinductions. Cognitive Psychology, 1997, 32:251~295
  • 8Heit E, Hahn U. Diversity-Based Reasoning in Children. Cognitive Psychology, 2001, 43:243~273
  • 9Gelman S A. The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 1988, 20:65~95
  • 10Lo Y, Sides A, Rozelle J, Osherson D. Evidential diversity and premise probability in young children's inductive judgment. Cognitive Science, 2002, 26:181~206

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部