期刊文献+

实物期权法与净现值法在R&D项目评价中的比较 被引量:1

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析了R&D项目特点,详细对比实物期权法与传统的净现值法在评价R&D项目的不同,并举例说明两种方法在R&D项目中的应用。
机构地区 武汉大学商学院
出处 《科技创业月刊》 2005年第9期19-20,共2页 Journal of Entrepreneurship in Science & Technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1[1]Avinash K Dixit and Robert S. Pindyck, Investments under Uncertainty, Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1994.
  • 2[2]Hemantha C. B Heart and Chan. S Park, Economic Analysis of R&D Projects: an Option Approach[J],The Engineering Economist, 1: 44 (1994), 1 - 35.
  • 3[3]Panayis and L. Trigeorgis, Multi-stage Real Options: The Case of Information Technology Infrastructure and Intermation Bank Expansion[J], The Quartly Review of Economics and Finance,1998, Special Issue (38) :675-692.
  • 4[4]Helen Weeds,"Reverse Hystersis": R&D Investment with Stochastic Innovation 1999, Warick Economic Research Papers, No 578.
  • 5[5]Eduardo S. Schwartz and Carlos Zozays-Gorostiza, Valuing Investments in Information Technology as Real Options, 2001a, UCLA Working Paper.
  • 6查看详情.
  • 7Geske R.The valuation of compound options,1979.
  • 8Myers Stewart C.Finance Theory and Financial Strategy,1984(1-2).
  • 9Amram M;Kulatilaka N.Reol Options:managing strategic investment in an uncertainty world,1998.
  • 10Faulkner Terrence W.Applying "Option Thinking" to R&D Valuation,1996.

共引文献28

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部