期刊文献+

EBT检测对冠脉病变危险因素的价值 被引量:2

Risk assessment of coronary artery damage by Electron-beam tomography
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:应用电子束CT(EBT)心脏扫描,了解受检者冠脉病变的发生情况,分析冠脉病变发生的危险因素.方法:107例受试者行心脏EBT扫描,计算冠脉钙化发生率、钙化积分、冠脉狭窄支数和软斑数,同时收集血糖、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、血脂等相关临床信息,进行冠脉病变危险因素的分析.结果:糖耐量受损组、糖尿病组、高血压病组冠脉钙化发生率较正常对照组显著升高(93%,96%,90%vs56%,P<0.01).钙化积分有明显升高趋势,但统计学检验无显著性差异.冠脉狭窄支数和软斑数显著增加(2.2±2.0,3.0±1.9,2.2±1.1vs0.5±1.3,P<0.05和2.5±2.4,2.9±1.8,2.3±1.8vs0.5±1.2,P<0.05).Logistic回归分析,发现糖尿病、高血压两因素对冠脉病变的影响有统计学意义(P<0.05),OR值分别为7.514(95%可信区间0.885~63.778)、6.653(95%可信区间1.344~32.928).结论:糖尿病、高血压病患者发生冠脉病变有高度的危险性. AIM: To assess the risk of coronary artery damage by electron beam tomography (EBT) in population. METHODS: A total of 107 subjects aged 36 -78 years underwent cardiac EBT, with coronary artery calcification ( CAC ) incidence, calcium scoring, stenosed arteries and soft plaques calculated. Laboratory evaluation included measurement of 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTr) , HbAlc, triglyceride, total cholesterol. Logistic regression analysis was taken to assess the risk for coronary artery damage. RESULTS : The incidences of CAC in IGT ( 93% ), diabetes ( 96% ) and hypertension ( 90% ) groups were significantly (P 〈0.01 ) higher than that in the normal(56% ). The scores of CAC in IGT, diabetes and CHD groups were also higher though they did not quite reach statistical significance because of our cohort size. The numbers of stenosed arteries and soft plaques were more than those in the normal (2.2±2.0, 3.0±1.9,2.2±1.1vs0.5+1.3,P〈0.05 and 2.5±2.4,2.9±1.8,2.3±1.8 vs 0.5 + 1.2, P 〈 0.05 ). The result of logistic regression analysis : OR of diabetes group was 7.514 ( 95 % CI : 0. 885~63. 778 ) and OR of hypertension group was 6. 653 ( 95% CI : 1. 344~32. 928 ). CONCLUSION: The diabetes and hypertension patients have higher risk for coronary artery damage.
出处 《心脏杂志》 CAS 2005年第4期380-382,共3页 Chinese Heart Journal
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 危险性分析 冠脉钙化 糖尿病 coronary disease risk assessment coronary artery damage diabets mellitus
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Raggi P. Coronary calcium on electron beam tomography imaging as a surrogate marker of coronary artery disease [ J ]. Am J Cardiol,2001,87(4A) :27A -34A.
  • 2Anonymous. Most patients with cardiac disease have classic risk factors[J]. Geriatrics, 2003, 58(10) : 15 -21.
  • 3Weitzman S, Wang C, Rosamond WD, et al. Is diabetes an independent risk factor for mortality after myocardial infarction? The APdC ( Atherosclerosis risk in communities) surveillance study [ J ].Acta Diabetologica, 2004, 41( 2): 77-86.
  • 4Achenhach S, Moshage W, Roperts D. Comparison of contrast enhanced electron beam CT and coronary angiography in 125 patients [ J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998,31 : 128A - 135A.
  • 5郑敏文,葛雅丽,石明国,张劲松,赵宏亮,白桂琴,李剑.电子束CT血管三维重建技术与冠状动脉成像[J].实用放射学杂志,2004,20(1):28-30. 被引量:11
  • 6孙红岩,贾国良,王海昌,郭文怡,栾荣华,吕安林,李成祥,李伟杰,郑敏文.电子束CT冠状动脉成像同血管造影的对比[J].第四军医大学学报,2003,24(3):257-259. 被引量:3
  • 7Lusher TF, Crcager MA, Beckman JA, et ad. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: Part II. Circulation, 2003,108(13) :1655 - 1661.
  • 8代铁成,梁晓光,齐国先.中老年女性冠心病并发高血压患者冠状动脉病变特点分析[J].临床心血管病杂志,2004,20(2):112-112. 被引量:4

二级参考文献14

  • 1[1]Achenbach S, Moshage W. Coparison of vessel diameters in electron beam tomography and quantitative coronary angiography [J]. Int J Cardiac Imaging, 1998;14:1-7.
  • 2[2]Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D. Value of electron beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary artery stenoses and occlusions [J]. N Engl J Med, 1998;21:323-330.
  • 3[3]Thomas PJ, Mc Collugh CH, Ritman EL. An electron beam CT approach for transvenous coronary angiography [J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1995;19:383-389.
  • 4[4]Chernoff DM, Ritchie CJ, Higgins CB. Evaluation of electron beam CT coronary angiography in healthy subjects [J]. Am J Roentgenol, 1997;169:93-99.
  • 5[5]Schmermund A, Rensing BJ, Sheedy PF, Bell MR, Rumberger JA. Intravenous electron-beam computed tomographic coronary angiography for segmented analysis of coronary artery stenoses [J]. J Am coll Cardiol, 1998;31:1454-1455.
  • 6[6]Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D.Comparison of contrast-enhanced electron beam CT and coronary angiography in 125 patients [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998;31:128A.
  • 7[7]Wexler L, Brundage BH, Crouse J, Detrano R, FusterV. Coronary artery calafication: pathophysiology ,epidemiology, imaging methods and clinical implications [J]. Circulation, 1996;94:1175-1192.
  • 8[8]Budoff MJ, Georgiou D, Brody A ,Agatston AS. Ultrafast computed tomography as a diahnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: A multicenter study [J]. Circulation, 1996;93:898-904.
  • 9[9]Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS. Coronary artery calcium areas by electron beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area: A histopathologic corrlative study [J]. Circulatiom, 1995;92:2157-2162.
  • 10[10]Hoshi T, Yamauchi T, Kanauchi T. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography of coronary artery hypass graft with electron beam tomography [J]. J Cardiol, 2000;38(4):197-202.

共引文献14

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部