摘要
朱熹认为《春秋》是史,是因为反对经学家一字褒贬的解经法,直把《春秋》看作史;朱熹不从一字褒贬中解经,而从具体史实中体会《春秋》义理。同时,他将义理贯穿于《春秋》史事之中,并将义理作为史书写作的指导原则。然而《春秋》义理本身却是不融通的,所以视《春秋》为史,出于朱熹对《春秋》义理不能融通之后无奈的选择。
Zhu Xi treated Chun Chiu as a history book, objecting the traditional Confucian classic explanation method, which confined to find meaning in the absolute and single word or sentence. Zhu Xi found the meaning from the history facts, and made the meaning the main thread to explain the history and the main principle to write history as well. To treat Chun Chiu as a history book is his only choice when he found no way to find the meaning of Chun Chiu without dogmatism and assertion.
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第3期49-53,共5页
Journal of Historiography
关键词
春秋
朱熹
义理
Chun Chiu Zhu Xi Meaning
