期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

颈部脊髓损伤患者采用四肢瘫功能指数（QIF）评定效果的初步观察 被引量：3

The Quadriplegia Index of Function in Use with Quadriplegic Patients:A Prelimi-nary Report
暂未订购
导出
摘要 本文报告１６名颈部脊髓损伤患者试用ＱＩＦ评定的初步结果。分析表明：ＱＩＦ评定法能够科学有效而准确地反映出四肢瘫患者经过康复训练取得重要的功能改善的细微变化，比Ｂａｒｔｈｅｌ指数和日本ＡＤＬ表更能具体地反映出康复效果，因此，ＱＩＦ更适用于四肢瘫患者的康复评定。 Presented in this paper is a report on the Quadriplegia Index of Function(QIF) in usewith 16 cases of quadriplegic patients.Compared with the Barthel Index and Japan ADL Scale,QIF wasfound to be more sensitive and effective to document the small but significant funtional gains made byquadriplegics during medical rehabilitation,therefore,authors suggest that QIF should be widely usedin the rehabilitation evaluation of quadriplegic patients.
作者 汪家琮 周红骏 刘根林 马玉华 陈玉芬 吴雪梅 刘雪梅 胡双彦 张爱民
机构地区 北京博爱医院脊髓损伤康复科
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 1995年第1期10-12,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词 颈部 脊髓损伤 四肢瘫功能指数 日常生活活动 Quadriplegia Quadriplegia Index of Function Barthel Index Activities of Daily Living
分类号 R651.2 [医药卫生—外科学]
  • 相关文献

同被引文献19

  • 1周红俊,刘根林.四肢瘫功能指数（QIF）评定法介绍[J].中国康复理论与实践,1996,2(1):18-25. 被引量：4
  • 2Gresham. The Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF): sensitivity and reliability demonstrated in a study of thirty quadriplegic patients [J]. Paraplegia,1986.24(1):38 -44
  • 3Lee, Ostrander Cochran et al. The Spinal Cord Injured Patient: comrehensive management [ M ]. Philadelphia: saunders company, 1991. 124 - 129
  • 4Yarkony GM, Roth EJ, Heinemann AW. Rehabilitation outcomes in C6 tetraplegia[J]. Paraplegia, 1988,26(3) : 177-185.
  • 5Marino RJ, Huang M, Knight P, et al. Assesing selfcare status in quadriplegia., comparison of the quadriplegia index of function(QIF) and the functional independence measure (FIM) [J]. Paraplegia, 1993,31(4) :225-233.
  • 6Ota T, Akaboshi K, Nagata M, et al. Functional assessment of patients with spinal cord injury: measured by the motor score and the Functional independence Measure [J]. Spinal Cord, 1996, 34 (9):531-535.
  • 7Grey N, Kennedy P. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative study of clinician and self ratings[J]. Paraplegia, 1993,31 (7) :457-461.
  • 8Davidoff GN, Roth EJ, Haughton JS, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients; sensitivity of the Functional Independence Measure subscales vs neuropsychologic assessment[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1990,71 (5) : 326-329.
  • 9Gresham GE, Labi ML, Dittmar SS, et al. The Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF) : sensitivity and reliability demonstrated in a study of thirty quadriplegic patients[J]. Paraplegia, 1986,24 (1) : 38-44.
  • 10Yavuz N, Tezyurek M, Akyuz M. A comparison of two functional tests in quadriplegia: the quadriplegia index of function and the functional independence measure[J]. Spinal Cord, 1998,36 (12) : 832-837.

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

中国康复理论与实践
1995年 第1期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部