摘要
殖民地作家在进行自身的文化书写时主要采用了三种方式:对抗性文化书写、认同性文化书写与混合性文化书写,然而这三种书写方式并没有摆脱西方文化霸权的话语圈套。后殖民作家的文化书写实践,在其有意无意之中,还与西方霸权的全球逻辑构成一种共谋与同犯,巩固了西方的霸权主义。面对这种困境,应该去除霸权话语的书写模式,强调文化书写的人民性、实践性与体验性,重构自身的文化形象。
Writers in colonies represent their cultures by three means: running against Western culture, identifying themselves with the local culture or mixing different cultures. However, the three means can't help them get away from the hegemony of Western culture. On the contrary, the literature of some postcolonial writers conspires with and strengthens the hegemony of Western culture. Faced with the dilemma, they should get rid of the writing modes which carry Western cultural hegemony. The postcolonial literature's culture representation should be faithful to the people's interests, to what there actually practices and to how people feel about their activities in society. In this way, a new image of their culture can be constructed.
出处
《外国文学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第4期114-120,共7页
Foreign Literature Studies
