期刊文献+

菊头蝠科蝙蝠鼻叶宽与回声定位声波主频率的相关分析 被引量:1

Correlation Analysis of Nose Leaf Width and Echolocation Domain Frequency in Rhinolophus Bats
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用SPSS分析8种菊头蝠科蝙蝠:贵州菊头蝠(Rhinolophusrex)、中菊头蝠(Rhinolophusaffinis)、托氏菊头蝠(Rhinolophusthomasi)、鲁氏菊头蝠(Rhinolophusrouxi)、小菊头蝠(Rhinolophusblythi)、马铁菊头蝠(Rhinolophusferrumequinum)、皮氏菊头蝠(Rhinolophuspearsoni)、角菊头蝠(Rhinolophuscornutus)的回声定位声波主频率(DF)与鼻叶宽(NW)的相关性,分析结果显示:在控制前臂长影响的情况下,菊头蝠回声定位声波主频率与鼻叶宽呈显著负相关(r=-0.8539,P=0.014),而在控制鼻叶宽影响的情况下,主频率与前臂长之间的相关性不显著(r=0.3849,P=0.394),由此可见,尽管声波主频率和鼻叶宽及前臂长均相关(r1=-0.918,P=0.001,df=6;r2=-0.711,P=0.048,df=6),但如果仅仅研究一个变量和主频率的关系时,鼻叶宽的意义更大。本文的最后,分析并探讨了上述负相关关系产生的机理。 Correlation between 8 species Rhinolophus bats' echolocation domain frequency and nose leaf width was analyzed,including Rhinolophus cornutus,Rhinolophus affinis,Rhinolophus Thomas,Rhinolophus roux,Rhinolophus blythi,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum,Rhinolophus pearsoni and Rhinolophus rex. The results suggested that the relationship was significantly negative correlation between domain frequency and nose leaf width(r=-0.8539,P=0c014)under forearm length influence controlled,however,the correlation was not significant between domain frequency and forearm length under nose leaf width controlled (r=0.3849,P=0.394). Although there was correlation among domain frequency,nose leaf width and forearm length(r1=-0.918,P=0.001,df=6;r2=-0.711,P=0.048,df=6),the significance of nose leaf width was better than forearm length with domain frequency,if only one correlation variable with domain frequency was studied. In the end,the mechanics of negative correlation were discussed.
出处 《长春师范学院学报(自然科学版)》 2005年第2期55-58,共4页 Journal of Changchun Teachers College
基金 国家自然科学基金(30370261) 吉林省杰出青年基金项目(20030114) 教育部重点项目(104257) 东北师范大学自然科学青年基金项目(2004030502)
关键词 菊头蝠 声波主频率 鼻叶宽 partial相关 Rhinolophus pulse domain frequency nose leaf width partial correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[2]Mark F.Robinson. A relationship between echolocation calls and noseleaf widths in bats of genera Rhinolophus and Hipposideros.J.Zool.,Lond, 1996,239:389~393.
  • 2[4]Heller K G,Helversen O. Resource partitioning of sonar frequency bands in Rhinolophoid bats.Oecologia, 1989,80:178~186.
  • 3[5]Charles M.Francis,J?rg Habersetzer. Interspecific and intraspecific variation in echolocation call frequency and morphology of horseshoe bats,Rhinolophus and Hipposederus.Washington and London:Smithsonian Institution Press, 1998,169~179.
  • 4冯江,陈敏,李振新,赵辉华,周江,张树义.八种菊头蝠回声定位声波频率与体型的相关性[J].动物学报,2002,48(6):819-823. 被引量:17
  • 5张树义,赵辉华,冯江,盛连喜,王晖,王立新.两种蹄蝠回声定位频率与体型的相关性[J].科学通报,2000,45(7):740-743. 被引量:13
  • 6[8]Altringham J D. Echolocation. In: Bats-Biology and Behaviour. Oxford University Press, 1996,128~236.
  • 7[9]Fenton,Bell.Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. J.Mammal,1981,62:233~243.
  • 8[10]Jones G,Rayner J M V.Flight performance,foraging tactics and echolocation in the trawling insectivorous bat Myotis adversus(Chiroptera:Vespertilionidae).J Zool Lond,1991,225:393~412.
  • 9[11]Bj?rn M.Simers,Teodora Ivanova. Ground gleaning in horseshoe bats:comparative evidence from Rhinolophus blasii,R.euryale and R.mehelyi. Behav.Ecol.Sociobiol,2004, 56:464~471.
  • 10[12]Neuweiler,G., W.Metzner, U.Heilmann, R.R?bsamen, M.Eckrich and H.H.Costa. Foraging behavior and echolocation in the rufous horseshoe bat(Rhinolophus rouxi)of Sir Landka. Behav.Ecol.Sociobiol, 1987,20:53~67.

二级参考文献18

  • 1吴应祥,刘东升,宋强辉,欧益宏.基于有限元强度折减法的抗滑桩滑坡推力及抗滑桩内力可靠性分析[J].岩土力学,2013,34(S1):348-354. 被引量:12
  • 2胡翌刚.高速公路路堑高边坡稳定性分析研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2005,2(4):72-76. 被引量:14
  • 3Arita, H. T. and M. B. Fenton 1997 Flight and echolocation in the ecology and evolution of bats. Tree 12 (2) : 53~58.
  • 4Feng, J. , Z. X. Li, M. Chen, J. Zhou, H. H. Zhao and S. Y. Zhang 2002 Echolocation comparison and ecological niche differentiation of five species of bats in the same.cave.ActaEcologica Sinica 22(2):11-16.[冯江,李振新,陈敏,周江,赵辉华,张树义2002同一山洞中五种蝙蝠回声定位比较及生态位分化.生态学报22(2):11-16.]
  • 5Francis, C. M. and J. Habersetzer 1998 Interspecific and intraspecific variation in echolocation call frequency and morphology of horseshoe bats,Rhinolophus and Hipposederos. In: Kunz, T. H. and P. A. Racey ed. Bat: Biology and Conservation. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 169~ 179.
  • 6Heller, K. G. and O. V. Helversen 1989 Resource partitioning of sonar frequency bands in rhinolophoid bats. Oecologia 80: 178~186.
  • 7Jones, G. and J. M. V. Rayner 1991 Flight performance, foraging tactics and echolocation in the trawling insectivorous bat Myotis adversus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). J. Zool. Lond. 225: 393~412.
  • 8Jones, G. and T. Kokurewicz 1994 Sex and age variation in echolocation calls and flight morphology of Daubenton's bats Myotis daubentonii.Mammalia 58 (1): 41~50.
  • 9Jones, G. 1999 Scaling of echolocation call parameters in bats. Journal of Experimental Biology 202:3 359~3 367.
  • 10Jones, G, T. Gordon and J. Nightingale 1992 Sex and age differences in the echolocation calls of the lesser horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus hipposideros. Mammalia. 56 (2): 189~193.

共引文献26

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部