期刊文献+

从人口腔细胞获取基因组DNA作基因多态性分析的可行性 被引量:10

Feasibility of Genetic Polymorphisms Analysis Using Genomic DNA Obtained from Human Buccal Cells
暂未订购
导出
摘要 背景与目的口腔洗液上皮细胞应用于检测基因多态性已有多篇文献报道,但口腔洗液中含有少量食物残渣是否给基因多态性检测带来干扰已备受关注。本研究比较口腔上皮细胞和血样品DNA中某些基因的多态性,同时以同样的方法检测食物中动植物组织的DNA,以排除食物残渣干扰实验结果的可能性,并探讨改良口腔洗液上皮细胞收集方法。方法收集62例人口腔洗液,每例收集40ml,加10ml异丙醇固定。其中30例进行细胞涂片检查上皮细胞含量,同时采集外周血5ml。另采集人们常食用的米饭、青菜、毛豆、苹果、猪肉、牛肉、鸡肉、鸭肉。所有样品分别经蛋白酶K消化,酚氯仿抽提,乙醇沉淀提取基因组DNA。结合PCR-RFLP技术进行口腔细胞和血细胞基因多态性分析比较。并用Alu片段测定人口腔洗液、外周血及上述食物DNA。结果62例口腔洗液DNA含量为(135.15±64.30)μg(22.36~330.70μg);其中30例经镜检含有人上皮细胞者有75%~95%,DNA含量为(143.44±61.64)μg(51.01~283.58μg);30例外周血中DNA含量为(91.19±38.01)μg(30.83~178.63μg)。琼脂糖凝胶电泳结果显示62例口腔上皮细胞和30例血样品均具有高分子量DNA,其中61例口腔细胞和30例血样品均能扩增茁-globin、Alu以及NAT2、GSTM1、GSTT1、CYP1A1和CYP2E1基因片段,但所有的食物DNA全部未能扩增。30例口腔洗液与相应血液的基因多态性结果一致。结论口腔洗液DNA大部分来源于人,即使含有少量食物残渣也不会给基因多态性分析带来干扰,其基因多态性检测结果与血样品DNA分析结果完全一致。 BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Using DNA samples obtained from buccal cells for genetic polymorphism analysis in molecular epidemiological studies has been repeatedly reported, but whether DNA from food remnants in mouth influences the result is still concerned. This study was to compare genetic polymorphisms of buccal cell DNA with those of buffy coat DNA, and with plant and animal DNA from foods to rule out the possibility of interference from food remnants, to improve technique of buccal cell collection and elevate DNA yield. METHODS: Buccal cells were collected from mouthwash (40 ml/case) of 62 subjects, and fixed with isopropyl alcohol; buffy coats of peripheral blood were collected from 30 of these subjects. Common foods (rice, greengrocery, soybean, apple, pork, beef, chicken, and duck) were also collected. DNA of all samples was extracted by chloroform-phenol method. NAT2, GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, and CYP2E1 genetic polymorphisms were assayed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique. Alu (human mutual DNA sequence) was also tested. RESULTS: DNA yield of 62 individual mouthwash samples was (135.15±64.30) μg (22.36-330.70 μg); 30 individual mouthwash samples contained 75%-95% oral epithelial cells with DNA yield of (143.44±61.64) μg (51.01-283.58 μg). DNA yield of 30 buffy coat samples was (91.19±38.01) μg (30.83-178.63 μg). Electrophoresis showed that all 62 buccal cell samples and 30 buffy coat samples contained DNA fragments in high molecular weight; ?茁-globin, Alu, NAT2, GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, and CYP2E1 gene fragments were successfully amplified from 61 buccal cells samples and 30 buffy coat samples, which showed no difference between the 2 kinds of samples from individual collections; these gene fragments were not amplified from all food DNA samples. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of DNA from mouthwash is human-origin. A little amount of food remnants would not influence the measurements of genetic polymorphisms. The genetic polymorphisms show no difference between buccal cell samples and buffy coat samples.
出处 《癌症》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第7期893-897,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cancer
关键词 口腔细胞 基因组DNA 基因多态性 上皮细胞 Mouthwash Buccual cells Genetic polymorphism Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism Alu NAT2 GSTM1 GSTT1 CYP1A1 CYP2E1
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Lum A, Le Marchand L. A simple mouthwash method for obtaining genomic DNA in molecular epidemiological studies [J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 1998,7(8) :719-724.
  • 2Cozier YC, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L.Comparison methods of collection of DNA samples by mail in the Black Women' s health study [J]. Ann Epidemiol, 2004, 14(2): 117-122.
  • 3Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Abruzzo J, et al. Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2001,10(6) :687-696.
  • 4Zheng S, Ma X, Buffler PA, et al.Whole genome amplification increases the efficiency and validity of buccal cell genotyping in pediatric populations[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2001,10(6) :697-700.
  • 5Kogan SC, Doherty M, Gitschier J.An improved method for prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases by analysis of amplified DNA sequences[J]. N Engl J Med, 1987,317(16):985-990.
  • 6Inatomi H, Katoh T, Kawamoto T, et al. NAT2 gene polymorphism as a possible marker for susceptibility to bladder cancer in Japanese [J]. Int J Urol, 1999,6(9) :446-454.
  • 7韩毅力,贺大林.芳香胺在膀胱肿瘤中的分子学机制[J].国外医学(泌尿系统分册),2001,21(1):10-12. 被引量:2
  • 8陈华,张一帆,许东坡,张祥福,孙昌盛.N-乙酰化酶多态性与胃癌关系的研究[J].癌变·畸变·突变,1998,10(4):236-238. 被引量:1
  • 9Hayashis S, Watanabe J, Kawajiri K.High susceptibility to lung cancer analyzed in terms of combined genotypes of P450 1A1 and mu-class glutathione S-transferase genes [J].Jpn J Cancer Res, 1992,83(8):866-870.
  • 10Zhao B, Sew A, Lee EJ, et al.Dietary isothiocyanates, glutathione Stransferase-M1, -T1 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk among Chinese women in Singapore [J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2001,10(10): 1063-1067.

二级参考文献8

共引文献14

同被引文献113

引证文献10

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部