期刊文献+

高等教育定价:2004年英格兰高等教育法案对大学的政策意义 被引量:3

Pricing in Higher Education:Implications for English Institutions in the Wake of the 2004 Higher Education Reform
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 2004年英格兰高等教育法案确定了不同学校、不同学科可以收取不同学费的差异收费原则。文章根据这一政策,运用博弈论的方法,提出了一个高等教育定价模型。在对模型解释的基础上,从一般意义上探讨了高等教育法案对于大学的政策意义。 A model is dev elo ped for the pr icing de cis ions of hig her ed uca tion ins titu tions in Eng land now that the 2004 Hi gher Edu cat ion Act has in tro duc ed the pri nci ple of tui tion fees that may be dif fer enti ated both acr oss inst itu ti ons and acr oss su bje cts. The model is cast in the tra dit ion of game the ory. Formal exp osi tion of the model is fo llo wed by more gene ral disc ussion of the im pli ca tions of the Act for higher educati on ins tit utio ns.
出处 《教育与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期1-3,共3页 Education & Economy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Bertrara A, J. L.F. (1883) Theorie mathernatique de la richesse sociale, Journal des Savants, 67, 499-508.
  • 2Bowen, H.R. (1980) The costs of higher education , San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • 3Johnes, G. (1992) Bidding for students in Britain - why the UFC auction 'failed', Higher Education, 23, 173 - 182.
  • 4Masten, S.E. (1995) Old school ties: financial aid coordination and the governance of higher education, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 28, 23 - 47.
  • 5Nash, J.F. (1951) Non- cooperative games, Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286 - 295.
  • 6Netz, J.S. (1998) Non - profits and price - fixing: the case of the Ivy League, Purdue University Working Paper, available online at http://econwpa.wustl.edu: 8089/eps/io/paperd9808/9808001. pdf.
  • 7Rothschild, M. and White, L.J. (1990) The university in the marketplace: some insights and some puzzles, in Charles T. Ciotfelter and Michael Rothschild ( eds ) Studies of supply and demand in higher education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部