摘要
朱熹提出《易》之本义为卜筮的见解，由此对程颐易学和义理学派提出批评。朱熹主张区分《周易》经传，提出易学发展阶段说。通过比较《周易本义》和《周易程氏传》，可见两者之异同。朱熹以象数、卜筮求易理，把义理学派与象数学派统一起来，从而发展了宋代易学。
ZHU Xi set forth the view that Yi 's original usage is for divination, basing on which he criticized the I Ching learning of CHENG Yi and the school interpreting Yi only with its philosophical connotations. ZHU Xi favored to distinct the Text of Zhouyi from its Commentaries and divided the development of I Ching learning into different stages. The similarities and differences between CHENG Yi and ZHU Xi's I Ching learning can be perceived by comparing the views of ZHU Xi's Zhou Yi Ben Yi (the Original Meanings of Zhouyi ) and CHENG Yi's CHENG Shi Yi Zhuan ( CHENG's Commentaries on Yi ). ZHU Xi seeks philosophical connotations of Yi in Yi 's image number system and divination. In this way, he integrated the image number school and that of philosophical connotations into one, and improved the I Ching learning research of the Song Dynasty.
出处
《周易研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第4期37-47,共11页
Studies of Zhouyi
关键词
朱熹
宋代易学
程颐
卜筮
象数
义理
ZHU Xi
I Ching learning research of the Song Dynasty
CHENG Yi
divination
image-number
philosophical connotations De M: M Xl
I Ching laning rerh of the song Dynasty
CHENG Yi
divinatbo1 im- age -- nurnber
phil(wpfucal connotations
