摘要
由 192 2年陈炯明事变引发的胡适与孙中山之间的冲突 ,除了表现新文化派一翼与国民党 (尤其是孙中山 ,孙“系”另当别论 )的观念分歧以及统一与分治的政见不合外 ,中共中央及北京、广东支部和苏俄、共产国际对于孙、陈态度、策略的变化起到至关重要的影响作用。事变引起各方利益关系的急剧变动 ,导致苏俄和中共对孙、陈的态度迅速发生重大调整。作为同路人 ,胡适虽然适时得知变动的内情 ,并力图协调口径 ,毕竟没有组织约束 ,而能保持独立姿态。由此可见 ,围绕这一事件 ,胡适的动向非但不显示其成为列强和军阀的代言人 ,反而是当时胡适“左倾”的一个例证 ,表明其在倾向社会主义和国民革命的过程中 ,一度与苏俄及中共走得相当近。
The conflict between Hu Shi and Sun Yat sen aroused by the Chen Jiongming Rebellion in 1922 showed the ideological differences between one wing of the New Culture School and the Guomindang (esp. Sun Yat sen, the “Sun Clique” is another matter), and their differing standpoints concerning political unity and division. In addition, changes in the attitude and strategy of the Central Committee of the CCP, the Beijing and Guangzhou Branches of the CCP, Soviet Russia and the Comintern toward Sun and Chen also played a crucial role in the conflict. The Rebellion led to drastic changes in the interest relations between the various sides, and brought about a significant adjustment in the attitude of Soviet Russia and the CCP toward Sun and Chen. Although as a fellow traveler Hu Shi knew the details of the incident, and tried to coordinate a unified response, he was nevertheless not bound by any organization, and could maintain a neutral position. From this we can see that Hu Shi's attitude in this incident does not demonstrate that he had become a spokesman for the Great Powers and the Warlords. Rather, it is an example of Hu Shi's “left leaning”, and shows that in the course of his inclination towards socialism and national revolution, his path was for a time quite close to that of Soviet Russia and the CCP.
出处
《近代史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第3期73-103,共31页
Modern Chinese History Studies
