摘要
我国刑法分则条文中的“明知”是注意规定 ,不是特殊规定 ;由于犯罪故意本身就包含了“明知” ,删除分则条文中的“明知”不会导致严格责任 ;由于控方承担证明责任是绝对的、无条件的 ,“明知”的证明责任仍在控方 ,但控方只需证明基本事实 ,即可推定被告方“明知”。
Knowing perfectly well” is a provision of attention but not a special provision in the criminal law in China. Because the criminal's intent itself includes “knowing perfectly well”, so it won't cause the strict liability to delete “knowing perfectly well” in specific provisions. And it's undeniable that the prosecuting party bears the proof responsibility, so as the proof responsibility of “knowing perfectly well”. Only the prosecuting party proof the basic fact, can we presume the accused knows perfectly well.
出处
《甘肃政法学院学报》
CSSCI
2005年第1期68-71,共4页
Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
