摘要
以《复印报刊资料》 (下称资料 )研究论文定量分析和 2 0 0 0 - 2 0 0 3年图书馆学情报学期刊全文转载排名为基础 ,通过比较其综合排名与《中文核心期刊要目总览》、《中文社会科学引文索引》、《中国人文社会科学核心期刊要览》的差异和CNKI、《中文科技期刊引文数据库》收录期刊基金论文和被引频次验证排名合理性 ,结果表明《资料》期刊排名有一定的合理性 。
Based on the quantitative analyses of research articles about The Reprography Newspaper and Journal Material and its journal ranking for journals in library and information science,the paper probes into the rationality of its journal ranking,the difference among its ranking journals and A Guide to the Core Journals of China,Chinese Social Science Citation Index,A Guide to the Core Journals of Chinese Humanity and Social Science has been analyzed,fund papers and citation frequency for journal ranking have been found from CNKI and Chinese Scientific and Technical Journal Citation Database.These result shows that its journal ranking has definite rationality,fund papers and citation frequency are two impersonality items for journal ranking.
出处
《图书馆论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第6期90-95,共6页
Library Tribune
